Teams

LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV

2021 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 9.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-13vs DTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Marquiz / Kimberly Taeubel vs Lynn Kellogg / Pamela Loyd2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJill Russell / Jodi Wagner vs Beverly Talaat / Chrys Smiley0-6, 2-6
2021-04-06vs DTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Marquiz / Kimberly Taeubel vs Nicole Saxton / Debbie Torbati2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJill Russell / Marie Roberts vs Claire Roth / Beverly Talaat4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-23vs DTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesJill Russell / Jodi Wagner vs Kim Haines / Mary Lynn Weber3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Taeubel / Jacqueline Marquiz vs Pamela Loyd / Lynn Kellogg3-6, 5-7
2021-03-16vs DTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKelly Hensley / Jill Russell vs Pamela Loyd / Lynn Kellogg2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Marquiz / Kimberly Taeubel vs Claire Roth / Debbie Torbati6-0, 6-1
2021-03-09vs DTCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJill Russell / Marie Roberts vs Kim Haines / Mary Lynn Weber3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Marquiz / Kimberly Taeubel vs Denise Antoniadis / Belinda Hines6-2, 6-3
2021-03-02vs DTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Marquiz / Kimberly Taeubel vs Kim Haines / Mary Lynn Weber4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJill Russell / Jodi Wagner vs Nicole Saxton / Debbie Torbati6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Kimberly Taeubel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
Marie Roberts
published
3.71
Jacqueline Marquiz
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.05
Jill Russell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jodi Wagner
published
Kelly Hensley
published
Tori McLanahan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Taeubel + Jacqueline Marquiz3549% games−8.7% vs expected
Tori McLanahan + Marie Roberts6066% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Wagner + Kelly Hensley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kimberly Taeubel
175W–105L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
4.18
Marie Roberts
50W–41L career · no lines in 2021
82%18%<1%
3.88
4
Jacqueline Marquiz
61W–55L career · 9 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
Jill Russell
54W–56L career · 6 lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
3.05
Jodi Wagner
45W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Hensley
12W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tori McLanahan
14W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.