Teams

KParks

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-11vs LBrockSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWilliam Durland / Jon Pershke vs Blake Paro / Graham Schillmoller6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMichael McGuire vs W Troutman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-27vs TSherburneWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael McGuire / William Durland vs Paul Holscher / Mike Hennen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-20vs JBRUCKEL 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael McGuire / William Durland vs John Bruckel / Michael Hamlett6-4, 6-1
2022-04-19vs ITMorrowLost 02
L#1 DoublesKeith Parks / Michael McGuire vs Christopher Siege / David Anderson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWilliam Durland / David Jarzemsky vs Samuel Connor / Douglas Pletcher7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-09Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMichael McGuire vs Jonathan Jenkins6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Gerber / William Durland vs Ben Barwick / Jason Tuttle4-6, 4-6
2022-04-06vs IFAllisonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Gerber / William Durland vs Justin Fejfar / Joe Goatcher6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-30vs AOLIVER_40Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael McGuire / Daniel Shields vs Gabe Jimenez / Brian Soltz7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Michael McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Charles George
published 4
3.76
William Durland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.51
Keith Parks
published
3.32
Brian Howell
published 3.5
3.17
Jason Steele
published
3.13
Dane Huffman
published 3.5
2.97
John Agnew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Durland + Michael McGuire224 matchesnot enough data
Brian Howell + Keith Parks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michael McGuire
42W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Charles George
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
William Durland
45W–51L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Keith Parks
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Brian Howell
17W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Jason Steele
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Dane Huffman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
John Agnew
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.