Teams

RCC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-31vs MEA NAVYSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJanice Cook / Martha Hamilton vs Lesley Smith / Kristen Royer2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Ronlov / Jill Nelson vs Pam Decker / Beth Saperstein6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-28vs BTA-IBM PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanice Cook / Sunita Jain vs Polly Rothberg / Kathy Lowenstein2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Petra McDonald / Susan Williams6-3, 6-4
2024-07-24vs BTA-IBM PURPLESplit 11
W#2 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Ann Larson / Linda Levy6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJanice Cook / Cher Babkiewich vs Kathy Lowenstein / Polly Rothberg3-6, 0-6
2024-07-19vs MEA NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Teri Jean Fry / Vicki Simpson6-1, 6-2
2024-07-10vs MEA NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Marie Banich / Teri Jean Fry3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanice Cook / Carmen Gunn vs Joan Bleacher / Diane Bohan7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-07-03vs BTA-IBM PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Hamilton / Janice Cook vs Petra McDonald / Susan Williams5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Bailey / Jeanne Vonachen vs Ann Larson / Linda Levy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Janice Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Cindy Ronlov
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Sunita Jain
published
2.82
Janice Cook
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Carmen Gunn
published 3
Maryl Bergeson
published
Patricia Sato
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Ronlov + Janice Bailey552858% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janice Bailey
95W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Cindy Ronlov
112W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Sunita Jain
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Janice Cook
69W–91L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Carmen Gunn
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maryl Bergeson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Sato
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.