Teams

BTA-IBM PURPLE

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-07vs MEA NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesPat Burgener / Kimberly Gerra vs Vicki Simpson / Diane Bohan6-3, 6-1
2024-07-28vs RCC REDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPetra McDonald / Susan Williams vs Janice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Gerra / Samantha McBride vs Patricia Sato / Cher Babkiewich6-3, 6-2
2024-07-24vs RCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesPat Burgener / Kimberly Gerra vs Sunita Jain / Jill Nelson6-2, 6-1
2024-07-17vs MEA NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPetra McDonald / Susan Williams vs Susan Lewis / Jackie Antoine6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPat Burgener / Polly Rothberg vs Lesley Smith / Lisa Varga6-4, 6-2
2024-07-03vs RCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesPetra McDonald / Susan Williams vs Martha Hamilton / Janice Cook7-5, 6-0
2024-06-26vs MEA NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesPat Burgener / Kimberly Gerra vs Vicki Simpson / Paula King6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Kimberly Gerra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Petra McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Kathy Lowenstein
published
3.10
Linda Levy
published
3.03
Pat Burgener
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Polly Rothberg
published
Samantha McBride
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Burgener + Kimberly Gerra11556% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kimberly Gerra
39W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Petra McDonald
30W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
Kathy Lowenstein
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Linda Levy
11W–30L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Pat Burgener
67W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Polly Rothberg
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Samantha McBride
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.