Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX7.0B

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

27 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 26 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Stephen Buchholz
published
3.72
Garvin Tom
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Thinh Vo
published
3.60
Sandra Harris
published
3.59
Justin Snyder
published
3.58
Scott Judy
published
3.56
Kathy Maratukulam
published
3.54
Jeff Bennett
published
3.44
Matthew Hedges
published
3.38
Sabrina McQueen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Kara Levy
published
3.33
Kevin Kyono
published
3.33
Audra Lutter
published 3.5
3.33
Rebecca Kay
published
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
3.27
Brigitte Shaw
published 3.5
3.26
Valerie Epting
published
3.24
Alan Lam
published 3.5
3.24
Dana Andrew
published 3.5
3.21
Melissa Bach
published
3.07
Yash Divekar
published
3.05
Mary Soe
published
2.98
Patrick Wong
published
2.97
Erin Brindley
published
2.88
Michelle Gonzales
published
2.44
John Hadley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Hedges + Rebecca Kay303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Buchholz
26W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Garvin Tom
23W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Thinh Vo
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Sandra Harris
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Justin Snyder
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Scott Judy
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Kathy Maratukulam
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Jeff Bennett
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Matthew Hedges
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Sabrina McQueen
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Kara Levy
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Kevin Kyono
28W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Audra Lutter
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Rebecca Kay
24W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brigitte Shaw
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Valerie Epting
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Alan Lam
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Dana Andrew
10W–23L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Melissa Bach
39W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Yash Divekar
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Mary Soe
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Patrick Wong
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Erin Brindley
37W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.97
Michelle Gonzales
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Cara Mia Barnacascel
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
John Hadley
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.