Teams

Pitman-Cummer/55/3.0/WD/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Adult 55 & Over - Women Day · 3.0 Shrev

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-08vs Terracciano-Cotton/55/3.0/WD/QTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarjorie Briley / Heather Duke vs Amy Evans / Alisa Cotton7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMadeline Cummer / Cynthia Payne vs Rhonda Terracciano / Beth Hopkins3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Jones / Lesa Warren vs Amy Juneau / Mona Cunningham6-4, 6-2
2026-03-01vs Picou/55/3.0/WD/BTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarjorie Briley / Melinda Dorsett vs Kim Allen / Tricia Laurent6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMadeline Cummer / Cynthia Payne vs Emilyn Horton / Melanie McCullough6-1, 6-2
2026-02-22vs Cox/55/3.0/WD/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLesa Warren / Amy Knotts vs Becky Crain / Katherine Firmin6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMadeline Cummer / Cynthia Payne vs Nancy Devers / Shirley Martin6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan McFarlain / Heather Duke vs Elaine Gilbert / Myrna Leggett2-6, 2-6
2026-02-15vs Cochran-Goode/55/3.0/WD/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichele Hardtner / Karen Hardtner vs Sally Joiner / Beverly Waller4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Knotts / Lesa Warren vs Sharon Boyd / Nancy Good6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMadeline Cummer / Cynthia Payne vs Mandy Barker / Marie Cote6-1, 6-1
2026-02-08vs McCotter/55/3.0/WD/STCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadeline Cummer / Cynthia Payne vs Gail Brown / Heidi Kallenberg6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Knotts / Heather Duke vs Georgia McCotter / Eileen Menard6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan McFarlain / Karen Hardtner vs Shannon Davidson / Allyson Brooks6-2, 6-4
2026-02-01vs Whittington/55/3.0/WD/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynette Campisi / Madeline Cummer vs Amy Phipps / Margaret Joe6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Jones / Lesa Warren vs Sharon Smith / Gulya Chandler6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFrances Pitman / Heather Duke vs Rose Whittington / Georgie Sutton6-2, 6-0
2026-01-18vs Swearingen/55/3.0/WD/QTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Knotts / Melinda Dorsett vs Marianne Boston / Belinda Allen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan McFarlain / Marjorie Briley vs Laretta Barrow / Debbie Angelo6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynette Campisi / Madeline Cummer vs Jena Gaines / Judy Rose7-5, 6-2
2026-01-11vs Hood-Stevenson/55/3.0/WD/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Jones / Marjorie Briley vs Shelly Fielder / Candace Harris7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMadeline Cummer / Lynette Campisi vs Lisa Davis / Angela Pfanner6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFrances Pitman / Amy Knotts vs Sharon Madden / Barri Copete7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.0 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pitman-Cummer/55/3.0/WD/POTC802048135
2Terracciano-Cotton/55/3.0/WD/QTC7119514160
3Cox/55/3.0/WD/BTC5315921179
4Swearingen/55/3.0/WD/QTC53141025216
5McCotter/55/3.0/WD/STCC4491532237
6Hood-Stevenson/55/3.0/WD/BTC26101430236
7Cochran-Goode/55/3.0/WD/BTC2691531229
8Picou/55/3.0/WD/BTC2691535258
9Whittington/55/3.0/WD/BTC1732142264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Cynthia Payne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.04
Lynette Campisi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.98
Heather Duke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Madeline Cummer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.73
Frances Pitman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Lesa Warren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Karen Hardtner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Marjorie Briley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Amy Knotts
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Susan McFarlain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Michele Hardtner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melinda Dorsett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madeline Cummer + Cynthia Payne7265% games+3.1% vs expected
Madeline Cummer + Lynette Campisi314 matchesnot enough data
Madeline Cummer + Frances Pitman213 matchesnot enough data
Michele Hardtner + Karen Hardtner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cynthia Payne
12W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Lynette Campisi
57W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Heather Duke
16W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Madeline Cummer
48W–37L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Frances Pitman
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Lesa Warren
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Karen Hardtner
16W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Marjorie Briley
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Amy Knotts
20W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
Susan McFarlain
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Michele Hardtner
3W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
38%61%<1%
2.54
Melinda Dorsett
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.