Teams

Silver Streaks

2021 55&Over Women · 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-31vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Hauber / Paula Doherty vs Lori McCaffrey / Barbara Glasser0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Parks / Sherry Best vs Erin Hoffman / Elizabeth Goldstein2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Davis / Kathleen Kalmer vs Cathy Lott / Mary Fiess Shaffer1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-08-10vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherry Best / Randi Dessingue vs Jacqueline Falvey / Lori McCaffrey3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Hauber / Kathleen Parks vs Erin Hoffman / Elizabeth Goldstein7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShari Calnero / Paula Doherty vs Mary Fiess Shaffer / Barbara Glasser2-6, 1-6
2021-08-03vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Moran / Paula Doherty vs Jacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Davis / Shari Calnero vs Elizabeth Goldstein / Lori McCaffrey7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Hauber / Martha Fashouer vs Nancy Lott / Cathy Lott2-6, 1-6
2021-07-20vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherry Best / Karen Zuzek vs Cathy Lott / Barbara Glasser6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Doherty / Randi Dessingue vs Jacqueline Falvey / Lori McCaffrey0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Davis / Shari Calnero vs Mary Beth Campito / Dee Fallati6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-15vs Northern: Wise AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Hauber / Judy Pittz vs Lori McCaffrey / Wendi Enright1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSherry Best / Karen Zuzek vs Jacqueline Falvey / Leslie Roccario5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Moran / Martha Fashouer vs Dee Fallati / Mary Beth Campito2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-08vs Northern: Wise AcesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Pittz / Kathleen Moran vs Nancy Lott / Wendi Enright5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Davis / Kathleen Kalmer vs Barbara Glasser / Leslie Roccario4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Hauber / Paula Doherty vs Jacqueline Falvey / Lori McCaffrey4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Wise Aces5115311126
2Silver Streaks1531533206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Deborah Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Judy Pittz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Sherry Best
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Randi Dessingue
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.01
Cindy Denney
published 3
2.94
Kathleen Moran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Kathleen Kalmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Suzanne Hauber
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Shari Calnero
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Paula Doherty
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Karen Zuzek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kathleen Parks
published
Martha Fashouer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Best + Randi Dessingue4445% games+7.2% vs expected
Sherry Best + Karen Zuzek3448% games+2.4% vs expected
Kathleen Kalmer + Shari Calnero4352% games−0.9% vs expected
Kathleen Moran + Cindy Denney3547% games−2.0% vs expected
Kathleen Moran + Judy Pittz2345% games−6.0% vs expected
Paula Doherty + Kathleen Moran7852% games−7.6% vs expected
Paula Doherty + Suzanne Hauber1632% games−13.7% vs expected
Kathleen Moran + Martha Fashouer2341% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deborah Davis
66W–113L career · 6 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Judy Pittz
67W–44L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Sherry Best
56W–82L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Randi Dessingue
67W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Cindy Denney
54W–75L career · no lines in 2021
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Kathleen Moran
102W–131L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Kathleen Kalmer
127W–117L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Suzanne Hauber
68W–90L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Shari Calnero
91W–102L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Paula Doherty
50W–141L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
2.69
Karen Zuzek
33W–41L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Parks
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Martha Fashouer
26W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.