Teams

SBTC-Here for the Beer

2022 SCTA Doubles League - Santa Barbara · SB - Men Doubles - 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-29vs Elings-Tennis is LifeLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Cantrell / Matthew Arnold vs Michael Mantai / Sergey Slyutov3-6, 4-6
2022-11-13vs SB-LLW-TS Hot Shots-Bernie CabilesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Cantrell / Matthew Arnold vs Jason Quisberth / Jaime Garibay3-6, 2-6
2022-10-30vs COAC-Average JoesLost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn Cantrell / Jeff Sherwood vs Arin Reza / Gregg Hart5-7, 2-6
2022-10-23vs Alisal-ColtsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Cantrell / Paul Hewitt vs Walt Seemann / Mark Inguaggiato6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-16vs Elings-Tennis is LifeWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Cantrell / Ralph Quijano vs Dylan Minor / Atul Malhotra6-4, 6-4
2022-09-18vs COAC-LIONSWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Cantrell / Paul Hewitt vs Melvin DeSilva / Albert Oaten0-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Men Doubles - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Matthew Arnold
published
3.74
Paul Hewitt
published
3.73
Jerry Jordano
published
3.71
Albert DiPadova
published 4
3.69
Thomas Jakobson
published
3.62
John Peltz
published
3.45
Jeff Sherwood
published
3.20
John Cantrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ken Wei
published
Kenneth Rotman
published
Ralph Quijano
published
Zohair Hussain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Jakobson + Ken Wei3842% games+0.1% vs expected
Paul Hewitt + John Peltz5547% games−2.6% vs expected
Albert DiPadova + John Peltz1736% games−17.1% vs expected
Jerry Jordano + Thomas Jakobson224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Sherwood + Paul Hewitt123 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Sherwood + John Peltz123 matchesnot enough data
Paul Hewitt + Albert DiPadova123 matchesnot enough data
Albert DiPadova + Thomas Jakobson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Arnold
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Paul Hewitt
15W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Jerry Jordano
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Albert DiPadova
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Thomas Jakobson
23W–30L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.69
John Peltz
17W–35L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jeff Sherwood
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
John Cantrell
48W–25L career · 6 lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.20
Ken Wei
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenneth Rotman
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ralph Quijano
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zohair Hussain
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.