Teams

BROADSTONE RC CW8.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 8.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-27vs MILLER PK CW8.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaurie Larson / Virginia Joel vs Emma Patterson / April Larson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mattos / Regina Infelise vs Tracy Quilala / Melissa Sloan6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Abels / Tammy Obrien vs Kirstin Kolpitcke / Jessica Peers6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Virginia Joel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Fritzie Dorais
published 4.5
4.15
Kimberly Becker
published
4.08
Jessica Abels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Tammy Obrien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Rayane Agha
published
3.90
Carrie Grip
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Gayle Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Julie Blanford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Jennifer Mattos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Jamie Ramsey
published 4
3.71
Regina Infelise
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Christy Wurster
published 4
3.62
Kellie Patterson
published
3.45
Lanie Steers
published
Jill A Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Blanford + Regina Infelise5257% games+9.3% vs expected
Tammy Obrien + Jennifer Mattos6360% games+4.1% vs expected
Regina Infelise + Jennifer Mattos7355% games+3.5% vs expected
Jessica Abels + Kimberly Becker3346% games−4.6% vs expected
Christy Wurster + Tammy Obrien224 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Ramsey + Tammy Obrien213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Virginia Joel
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%14%
4.36
4.5
Fritzie Dorais
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Kimberly Becker
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
Jessica Abels
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Tammy Obrien
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
Rayane Agha
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Carrie Grip
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Gayle Tanner
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
Julie Blanford
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
Jennifer Mattos
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Jamie Ramsey
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
Regina Infelise
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Christy Wurster
17W–22L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Kellie Patterson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.62
Lanie Steers
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Jill A Thompson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.