Teams

Guma/18/3.0/fran

2023 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brandon Allison
published 3.5
Alfred Johnson
published
Jared Freeman
published
Jason Bragg
published
Jason Ortis
published
John Shylock
published
Klint Beckendorf
published
Ricky Bearden
published
Scott Kugler
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandon Allison
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Alfred Johnson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jared Freeman
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Bragg
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Ortis
14W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Shylock
34W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Klint Beckendorf
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ricky Bearden
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Kugler
16W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.