Teams

LVTA CRIMSON

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-30vs CSU GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Huntley / Heidi Abrahamson vs Camille Benton / Rachel White6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Pielin / Amy Black vs Kim Jensen / Angeles Sanchez1-6, 3-6
2021-08-23vs LTSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Huntley / Heidi Abrahamson vs Julie Ignowski / Maria Ellis6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Black / Ashley Kasprzak vs Alison Halopoff / Janet Stearns6-7, 3-6
2021-08-16vs TAG MAGENTASplit 11
L#1 DoublesAshley Kasprzak / Heidi Abrahamson vs Kelsa Morgan / Nikki Ellis4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMeredith Lorick / Karen Pielin vs Janice Mossberg / Michelle Sheets6-1, 6-1
2021-08-09vs FCCC PINKWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Huntley / Heidi Abrahamson vs Haley Hasler / Kaylyn Shelby6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-02vs CSU GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Black / Ashley Kasprzak vs Sherri Kravec / Gina Hastings2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMeredith Lorick / Karen Pielin vs Paige Kanatous / Monica Bice6-3, 6-4
2021-07-26vs HMTC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Abrahamson / Heather Huntley vs Teresa Adsit / Cimarron Spitz6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs Gina Zachman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Kasprzak / Melissa King vs Jill Braddock / Krystal Thomas6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Meredith Lorick
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Heidi Abrahamson
published 3.5
3.35
Heather Huntley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Ashley Kasprzak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Pielin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Hilary Gaylord
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Pielin + Meredith Lorick8167% games+8.7% vs expected
Heidi Abrahamson + Heather Huntley441759% games+3.9% vs expected
Karen Pielin + Ashley Kasprzak4350% gamesnot enough data
Hilary Gaylord + Heather Huntley224 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Gaylord + Ashley Kasprzak123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Meredith Lorick
101W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%37%63%
4.04
3.5
Heidi Abrahamson
55W–26L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Heather Huntley
68W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Ashley Kasprzak
39W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Karen Pielin
65W–99L career · 3 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Hilary Gaylord
16W–27L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.