Teams

CSU GOLD

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-09-06vs HMTC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesRachel White / Nancy Pajak vs Kathy Lynch / Krystal Thomas6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2021-08-30vs LVTA CRIMSONLost 01
L#1 DoublesCamille Benton / Rachel White vs Heather Huntley / Heidi Abrahamson2-6, 1-6
2021-08-16vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRachel White / Camille Benton vs Gina Hastings / Falguni Gill6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBarbara Balok / Nancy Pajak vs Monica Bice / Paige Kanatous4-6, 5-7
2021-08-02vs FCCC PINKLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Balok / Nancy Pajak vs Kelli Barber / Melissa Conlon3-6, 0-6
2021-07-26vs TAG MAGENTALost 01
L#1 DoublesGail Milliken / Camille Benton vs Janice Mossberg / Joy Miller3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Kim Jensen
published
Angeles Sanchez
published 3.5
3.23
Camille Benton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Brenda Stewart
published 3.5
3.08
Rachel White
published
2.86
Nancy Pajak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Barbara Balok
published
Gail Milliken
published
Satie Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Stewart + Kim Jensen314 matchesnot enough data
Angeles Sanchez + Kim Jensen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Jensen
35W–30L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Angeles Sanchez
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Camille Benton
106W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Brenda Stewart
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Rachel White
7W–35L career · no lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Nancy Pajak
56W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
2.86
Barbara Balok
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Gail Milliken
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Satie Walker
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.