Teams

WOCC Oaks Moehling

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Wed

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Heather Drew vs Stephanie Marcus / Heather Long3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-09-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Amy Voelzke vs Christine Holt / Sarah Thomas2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-09-15vs Ridgetop PughWon 10
W#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Stacy Curtis vs Jenny Hanna / Sarah Huber6-2, 6-1
2021-09-08vs ACAC- Kelsey / DavisWon 10
W#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Heather Drew vs Jennifer Funk / Nikki Callaghan6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Brooke Kelly
published 4.5
3.88
Darlene Moehling
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.38
Heather Drew
published 3.5
3.21
Kelly Gregory
published
3.11
Janet Pommersheim
published
3.00
Sandy Pisano
published
2.97
Joy Chenault
published
2.94
2.82
Stacy Curtis
published
2.82
Anne Scher
published 3
2.81
Katy Knierim
published
2.76
Amy Voelzke
published 3
2.75
2.74
Catherine Hunt
published 3
2.66
Beth Kelly
published 3
2.53
Juliet Dagostino
published
Lorraine McQueen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Curtis + Catherine Matawaran3343% games−10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Kelly
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.31
4
Darlene Moehling
113W–77L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
3.5
Heather Drew
13W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Janet Pommersheim
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
Sandy Pisano
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
Joy Chenault
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Catherine Ianchulev
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
2.94
Stacy Curtis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Anne Scher
17W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Katy Knierim
15W–8L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Amy Voelzke
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Catherine Matawaran
16W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Catherine Hunt
6W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Beth Kelly
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
2.66
Juliet Dagostino
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
2.53
Lorraine McQueen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.