Teams

Samuell Grand/Young W4.0S

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

19 players · average NTRP 3.93 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
3.98
Ellen Oliver
published 4
3.94
Natalie Clarkson
published
3.88
Sarah Wollitz
published
3.84
Lisa Buitron
published
3.79
Katie Fleming
published
Dana Koerner
published 4
3.74
Lisa Lajous
published
3.71
Katie Tran
published
3.70
Julie Fetter
published
3.64
Elizabeth Vice
published 4
3.64
Danielle White
published 4
3.57
Michelle Hefner
published
3.38
Amber Morefield
published 3.5
3.35
Sarah Hamlin
published
3.23
Aundi Henderson
published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Sepulveda
published
Geraldine Brown
published
Ginette Beecherl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aundi Henderson + Lisa Buitron7356% games+6.5% vs expected
Katie Tran + Danielle White6156% games+1.4% vs expected
Amber Morefield + Lisa Buitron5550% games−1.1% vs expected
Michelle Hefner + Natalie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Katie Tran + Michelle Hefner303 matchesnot enough data
Dana Koerner + Ellen Oliver213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Hefner + Danielle White213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Lajous + Michelle Sepulveda123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexandra Northington
24W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Ellen Oliver
33W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
Natalie Clarkson
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.94
Sarah Wollitz
35W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
Lisa Buitron
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
Katie Fleming
34W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Dana Koerner
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Lajous
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
Katie Tran
33W–19L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
Julie Fetter
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Elizabeth Vice
20W–16L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Danielle White
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
Michelle Hefner
30W–40L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Amber Morefield
35W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
Sarah Hamlin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.35
3.5
Aundi Henderson
32W–28L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Michelle Sepulveda
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Geraldine Brown
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ginette Beecherl
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.