Teams

BLACKHAWK CC CW5.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 5.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Jeannette Michiels
published
3.31
Nicole Field
published
3.30
Ramya Jayaraman
published
3.27
Aliza Grosh
published 3.5
3.23
Rachelle Ricketts
published
3.19
Rose Spicer
published
3.13
Samantha Ng
published
3.07
Kirsten Sines
published
2.99
Angela Beck
published 3
2.89
Noelle Sheehan
published
2.89
Tina Ly
published
2.83
Dana Keating
published 3
2.83
Joanna Ha
published
2.72
Maureen Thompson
published
2.67
Luz Ernest
published
2.67
Beth Negrete
published 3
2.66
Joan Leone
published
2.62
Kristine Kennedy
published
2.52
Natasha Deguzman
published
2.50
Daisy Ma-Piel
published 3
2.36
Teresa Brannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luz Ernest + Joan Leone224 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Ng + Joanna Ha134 matchesnot enough data
Ramya Jayaraman + Jeannette Michiels404 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Sines + Natasha Deguzman314 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Kennedy + Joan Leone033 matchesnot enough data
Rachelle Ricketts + Kirsten Sines213 matchesnot enough data
Rose Spicer + Ramya Jayaraman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeannette Michiels
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Nicole Field
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Ramya Jayaraman
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Aliza Grosh
9W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Rachelle Ricketts
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Rose Spicer
7W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Samantha Ng
30W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
Kirsten Sines
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.07
3
Angela Beck
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
Noelle Sheehan
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Tina Ly
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Dana Keating
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
Joanna Ha
23W–26L career · no lines in 2023
0%1%99%
2.83
Maureen Thompson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Luz Ernest
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%11%89%
2.67
3
Beth Negrete
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
Joan Leone
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%13%87%
2.66
Kristine Kennedy
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
0%20%80%
2.62
Natasha Deguzman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%45%55%
2.52
3
Daisy Ma-Piel
1W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
Teresa Brannon
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.