Teams

RISE AC-Mower/Longson

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesMary Silver / Shelley Petersen vs Paula Neill / Jamie Dunbabin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-24vs Sports Mall-Henderson/WalljasperWon 30
W#2 DoublesLisa Cannon / Shelley Petersen vs DeeAnn Henderson / Shauna Lake0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Britany Egan6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAubrey Pluim / Jenni Price vs Michelle Edwards / Claudine Finlay7-5, 7-5
2022-05-17vs Red Ledges-Clark/ChristensenLost 13
W#1 DoublesJenni Price / Nicole Garff vs Lisa Wade / Melinda Romney7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Deyce Peterson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Petersen / Mary Vander Straten vs Rachel Ray / Lisa Olson5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Silver / Aubrey Pluim vs Carly Reese / Heidi Clark1-6, 4-6
2022-05-10vs Park City MARC-Leigh/EpsteinLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenni Price / Sara Johnson vs AMy Huish / Jutien Page7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Vander Straten / Shelley Petersen vs Lynn Russo / Charlotte Trahan3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Moss / Juliette Longson vs Terry Sidford / Kim Persky7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-06Won 21
L#2 DoublesMary Silver / Aubrey Pluim vs Rebecca Harman / Emily Hales6-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Sherrie Hatch4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicole Garff / Lisa Cannon vs Jessica Whittaker / Jennifer Tooley6-4, 6-1
2022-05-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Cannon / Shelley Petersen vs Katri Koehle / Kim Santiago1-6, 3-6
2022-04-26vs Sunpro-Barber/WestoverWon 21
W#2 DoublesSara Johnson / Jenni Price vs Cynthia Bedford / Seidi Bennett6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Raquel Westover3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Silver / Shelley Petersen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-19vs Cottonwood Club-Kieffer/AnnunziataLost 03
L#1 SinglesLindsay Moss vs Angela Boyden2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Silver / Mary Vander Straten vs Lauren Annunziata / Tracy Duncan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJuliette Longson / Lisa Cannon vs Robin Simmons / Shala West4-6, 2-6
2022-04-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/EwingSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJuliette Longson / Aubrey Pluim vs Ann Trentman / Shelly Kemp6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJenni Price / Shelley Petersen vs Lezlae Grubb / Valeriya Vasenina6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kristi Warren
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
3.71
Jenni Price
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.68
Nikki Mower
usually #2 Singles 90%, also #1 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.40
Shelley Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
2.88
Mary Vander Straten
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
Juliette Longson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lindsay Moss
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lisa Cannon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Silver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nicole Garff
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Sara Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Stacey Schmerse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Warren + Sara Johnson8175% games+13.0% vs expected
Nikki Mower + Nicole Garff10656% games+6.1% vs expected
Shelley Petersen + Mary Vander Straten3548% games+5.7% vs expected
Jenni Price + Nicole Garff20658% games+5.0% vs expected
Lisa Cannon + Shelley Petersen11257% games+3.9% vs expected
Nikki Mower + Sara Johnson10460% games+3.8% vs expected
Lisa Cannon + Juliette Longson5946% games+2.3% vs expected
Nikki Mower + Jenni Price2841% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristi Warren
249W–137L career · 16 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Jenni Price
110W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Nikki Mower
123W–92L career · 10 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Shelley Petersen
87W–90L career · 7 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
3
Mary Vander Straten
95W–175L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.88
Juliette Longson
24W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsay Moss
51W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Cannon
45W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Silver
21W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Garff
91W–49L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Johnson
53W–10L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacey Schmerse
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.