Teams

Ace Athletics-Harman

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

18 players · average NTRP 3.31 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-27vs Park City MARC-WrightWon 10
W#2 DoublesShannon Day / Karen Borski vs Betsy Wright / Megan Rusconi7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Borski / Kyra Dunshee vs Betty Peterson / Susan Knight3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesKyra Dunshee / Glenna Frey vs Elizabeth Michie / Ingrid Hansen6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Borski / Kristen Holm vs Elizabeth Harris-Johnson / Cathy Angstman6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Borski / Kristen Holm vs Carina Lambert / Sarah Collins7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKyra Dunshee vs Jamuna Nielsen6-4, 6-4
2025-04-29vs Utah/Wade/18&Over3.5WWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca Harman / Kristen Holm vs Jennifer Stone / Jocelyn Bennion3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesShannon Day vs Cheryl A McCullough6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKyra Dunshee / Glenna Frey vs Lisa Olson / Jen Dagley7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-22vs Ivory Ridge-AdamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Borski / Glenna Frey vs Sara Madsen / Tiffany Riley7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Silver / Elaine Day vs DeeAnna Barlow / Monique Tidd2-6, 1-6
2025-04-15vs Ogden-AndersenWon 20
W#1 SinglesShannon Day vs Sally Anderson7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Borski / Kristen Holm vs Betty Yamashita / Kaye Moulding7-5, 6-2
2025-04-08vs SunPro-Parker/StringhamLost 02
L#1 DoublesGlenna Frey / Kyra Dunshee vs AnnMarie Chadwick / Cheryl Harker2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMary Silver / Kristen Holm vs Jill Marsh / Liz Rowley0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Shelley Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.23
Mary HENSLEY
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published
3.20
Angelyn Sorenson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.19
Jessica Whittaker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.14
Kyra Dunshee
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Glenna Frey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Jennifer Madison
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.95
Andrea Erickson
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.91
Lori Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.88
Karen Borski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.85
Maria Pettit
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Rebecca Harman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #2 Doubles 61%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.63
Elaine Day
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.48
Mary Jane Swalberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Holm
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Silver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Day
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary HENSLEY + Angelyn Sorenson321757% games+8.6% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Maria Pettit5649% games+3.9% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Jessica Whittaker121151% games+2.4% vs expected
Mary Jane Swalberg + Maria Pettit81144% games+2.2% vs expected
Mary HENSLEY + Jennifer Madison4451% games+2.1% vs expected
Lori Wilson + Rebecca Harman41641% games+1.8% vs expected
Glenna Frey + Shelley Petersen4354% games−1.3% vs expected
Glenna Frey + Kyra Dunshee392850% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shelley Petersen
87W–90L career · 8 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Mary HENSLEY
60W–63L career · 13 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Angelyn Sorenson
71W–52L career · type A · 10 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jessica Whittaker
87W–79L career · 8 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Kyra Dunshee
96W–117L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Glenna Frey
65W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Madison
63W–54L career · 10 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Andrea Erickson
30W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Lori Wilson
70W–154L career · 7 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Karen Borski
22W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
3
Maria Pettit
187W–196L career · 15 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Rebecca Harman
244W–303L career · 14 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 18 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Elaine Day
123W–244L career · 15 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Mary Jane Swalberg
76W–205L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Kristen Holm
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Silver
21W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Day
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.