Teams

Park City MARC-Wright

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.64 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-27vs Ace Athletics-HarmanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBetsy Wright / Megan Rusconi vs Shannon Day / Karen Borski6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlice Moe / Terry Sidford vs Lori Wilson / Maria Pettit6-2, 6-2
2025-05-20Split 11
L#2 DoublesAlice Moe / Terry Sidford vs Shauna Lake / Emily Hales1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTaylor Weymouth / Wendy Engel vs Claudine Finlay / Britany Egan6-3, 6-2
2025-05-13vs Utah/Wade/18&Over3.5WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesWendy Engel / Taylor Weymouth vs Jennifer Davies / Jessica Studdert0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlice Moe / Betsy Wright vs Lisa Wade / Jessica Larson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-06vs Ogden-AndersenWon 21
L#1 SinglesTessa Weise vs Jacki Joseph3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBetsy Wright / Alice Moe vs Jamie Tate / Mary Snow7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWendy Engel / Taylor Weymouth vs Betty Yamashita / Isabel Cristina Lau6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Carrington / Tessa Weise vs Maureen Russo / Mary Vander Straten6-2, 6-1
2025-04-25vs SunPro-Parker/StringhamWon 20
W#1 DoublesBetsy Wright / Kristin Baber vs AnnMarie Chadwick / Cheryl Harker6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlice Moe / Tessa Weise vs Katri Koehle / Jill Marsh7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-22vs Liberty Park-Leishman/EwingLost 02
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Carrington / Betsy Wright vs Lisa Ewing / Kadee Wolfgram6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Engel / Tessa Weise vs Emily Fuller / Shelly Kemp2-6, 5-7
2025-04-15vs Cottonwood Club-Annunziata/KiefferSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTaylor Weymouth / Elizabeth Carrington vs Jeanette Shepard / Carolyn Cottle2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlice Moe / Betsy Wright vs Angie Nelden / Carina Lambert6-2, 6-2
2025-04-08vs Ivory Ridge-AdamsLost 03
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Carrington / Betsy Wright vs Tiffany Riley / Cecia Croft7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTessa Weise vs Amy Droubay1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTaylor Weymouth / Wendy Engel vs Janee Roper / Tamsin Danis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Kelley Epstein
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.48
3.44
Renae Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.37
Megan Leonard
usually #2 Singles 82%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published
3.36
Elizabeth Carrington
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Wendy Engel
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
3.35
Kristin Baber
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Tessa Weise
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Darla Cardwell
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3.5
3.20
Alice Moe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Megan Rusconi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.17
June Castronovo
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 3.5
3.08
Betsy Wright
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Taylor Weymouth
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Terry Sidford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tessa Weise + Elizabeth Carrington8169% games+8.4% vs expected
Terry Sidford + June Castronovo4259% games+7.8% vs expected
Taylor Weymouth + Wendy Engel6356% games+6.5% vs expected
Kristin Baber + Kelley Epstein17759% games+4.2% vs expected
Betsy Wright + Wendy Engel4268% games+3.8% vs expected
Megan Rusconi + Renae Brooks191847% games+2.6% vs expected
Tessa Weise + Alice Moe7751% games+1.5% vs expected
Kristin Baber + Betsy Wright351361% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelley Epstein
109W–65L career · 9 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Leslie Goldman Tepper
14W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Renae Brooks
96W–131L career · 9 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Megan Leonard
35W–26L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Elizabeth Carrington
30W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Wendy Engel
60W–33L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Kristin Baber
98W–51L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Tessa Weise
42W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Darla Cardwell
54W–58L career · 9 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alice Moe
69W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Megan Rusconi
73W–128L career · 10 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
June Castronovo
26W–34L career · 11 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Betsy Wright
63W–42L career · 7 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Taylor Weymouth
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terry Sidford
28W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.