Teams

Liberty Park-Leishman/Ewing

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLesley Scruggs / Catherine Davey vs Angie Nelden / Sarah Collins1-6, 1-6
2025-05-06vs Ivory Ridge-AdamsLost 01
L#2 SinglesLesley Scruggs vs Tamsin Danis5-7, 4-6
2025-05-02vs Ogden-AndersenWon 10
W#2 DoublesKadee Wolfgram / Ann Trentman vs Mary Snow / Kaye Moulding6-3, 6-1
2025-04-22vs Park City MARC-WrightWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Ewing / Kadee Wolfgram vs Elizabeth Carrington / Betsy Wright2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-15Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLesley Scruggs vs Jennifer Sampson3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Alexa Saltzman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.27
Lisa Ewing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.25
Hannah Lee
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Jennie Stacey
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Ann Trentman
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Madelyn Totland
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.18
Terri Brunner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Kathi Poggi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Maryam Klock
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.08
Shelly Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Lesley Scruggs
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Allison Leishman
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.92
Kadee Wolfgram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Catherine Davey
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3
Emily Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Nicole Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tracee Kemp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Trentman + Lisa Ewing5257% games+8.5% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Allison Leishman4551% games+5.2% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Hannah Lee5258% games+4.9% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Terri Brunner9852% games+4.0% vs expected
Shelly Kemp + Terri Brunner161748% games+1.9% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Allison Leishman4443% games+1.9% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Hannah Lee3253% games+1.8% vs expected
Tracee Kemp + Hannah Lee2343% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexa Saltzman
126W–65L career · 17 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Lisa Ewing
123W–122L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Hannah Lee
101W–74L career · 12 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Ann Trentman
185W–245L career · 17 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Madelyn Totland
36W–44L career · 9 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
197W–228L career · 11 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Terri Brunner
141W–141L career · 10 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Kathi Poggi
56W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Maryam Klock
77W–91L career · 10 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Shelly Kemp
137W–133L career · 10 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Lesley Scruggs
30W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Allison Leishman
132W–209L career · 6 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Kadee Wolfgram
97W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Catherine Davey
21W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Fuller
24W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Fisher
100W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracee Kemp
38W–101L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.