Teams

OClaxton (Marvin Creek); The Cool Kids

2024-2025 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 4.0 Women Doubles; Evening

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-02-06vs TOrmand (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzy Sandbo / Yvette Gama vs Tanya Ormand / Taylor Dries2-6, 2-6
2025-02-02vs BLeonnig (Charlotte Swim); SFAMWon 10
W#1 DoublesYvette Gama / Dawn Castain vs Brooke Leonnig / Sameena Hassan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-17vs STorres (WSRC); Smash SquadLost 01
L#1 DoublesOfelia Claxton / Yvette Gama vs Sandra Torres / Michele Ovendorf6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesOfelia Claxton / Tracy Graham vs Mindy Merchant / Lee Page1-6, 4-6
2025-01-05vs JRust (Windyrush); Windyrush PlusLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Castain / Julie Williams vs Jessica Outterson / Janine Rust4-6, 3-6
2024-12-07vs MPaterson (Springfield)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesOfelia Claxton / Yvette Gama vs Natalie Fitzgerald / Maureen Paterson2-6, 3-6
2024-11-21vs RHoppe (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYvette Gama / Suzy Sandbo vs Elizabeth Workman / Tanya Willett5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-11-17vs CChildress (Matthews)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYvette Gama / Dawn Castain vs Carol Childress / Brantlee Green3-6, 4-6
2024-11-13vs DCazorla (BCC); 40 LoversLost 01
L#1 DoublesOfelia Claxton / Marianne Keaton vs April Pacheco / Michelle Lynch7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesYvette Gama / Dawn Castain vs Amanda Patrocino / Dawn Greenaway2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Doubles; Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Dawn Castain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Yvette Gama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Julie Williams
published
3.23
Ofelia Claxton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Castain + Yvette Gama231751% games−0.5% vs expected
Ofelia Claxton + Yvette Gama3354% games−3.6% vs expected
Ofelia Claxton + Dawn Castain033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Castain
165W–150L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Yvette Gama
166W–126L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Julie Williams
45W–37L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.29
3.5
Ofelia Claxton
125W–107L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.