Teams

NWO 18&Over 6.0 Mx Naus

2022 NWO Mixed 18 & Over · NWO MX 18 & Over 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-22vs NWO 18&Over 6.0Mx Mazzarella PTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBelinda Mermer / Roger Moungie vs Connor Senn / Amanda Smith3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Long / Jason Naus vs Tony Mazzarella / Judy Campbell1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTim Laird / Beth Szmania vs Jill Bolton / Michael Bolton6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJason Naus / Kimberly Heldreth vs Laura Nejedlik / Jeff Nonekowski4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Long / Tom Makley vs Michael Nejedlik / Esther Bryant5-7, 4-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrandi Laurita / Bob Kolvey vs Bhupesh Saini / Lynn Hoover6-2, 4-2
W#1 DoublesJason Smith / Lisa Baer-Dewhirst vs Brooke Stokke / Braston Stokke6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBelinda Mermer / Tom Makley vs Jennifer DeGroot / John Pletz6-2, 2-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrandi Laurita / Tim Laird vs Nicole Worth / Doug Isabell6-2, 6-0
2022-03-06vs NWO 18&Over 6.0Mx Cody-TWOSWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Heldreth / Jason Naus vs Mindy Kairis / Brian Berk6-7, 2-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrandi Laurita / Bob Kolvey vs Aparna BROWN / Omar Okdie6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBelinda Mermer / Tom Makley vs Nicole Banker / Wade Banker6-4, 2-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NWO MX 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Tim Laird
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Bob Kolvey
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.97
Roger Moungie
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Lisa Baer-Dewhirst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Beth Szmania
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Belinda Mermer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.63
Brandi Laurita
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Jason Naus
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kimberly Heldreth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Makley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Heldreth + Jason Naus4154% games+6.3% vs expected
Lisa Baer-Dewhirst + Roger Moungie3654% games+1.5% vs expected
Bob Kolvey + Brandi Laurita5357% games−4.2% vs expected
Roger Moungie + Brandi Laurita4350% games−6.2% vs expected
Tom Makley + Belinda Mermer5352% gamesnot enough data
Tim Laird + Brandi Laurita4161% gamesnot enough data
Jason Naus + Brandi Laurita2349% gamesnot enough data
Jason Naus + Belinda Mermer2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Laird
87W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Bob Kolvey
158W–102L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%6%94%
3.21
Roger Moungie
109W–121L career · 5 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Lisa Baer-Dewhirst
64W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Beth Szmania
42W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Belinda Mermer
66W–59L career · 7 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Brandi Laurita
53W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.63
Jason Naus
87W–113L career · 5 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
Kimberly Heldreth
84W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurie Long
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Makley
19W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.