Teams

WESB:Tri Candy:Jeppson/Liang

2024 EMA Tri Level Winter · Spring

5 players · average NTRP 5.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-22vs WESF:Westfit:LuneauLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Jeppson / Carolynn Crabtree vs Jaclyn Race / Jennifer Girasole2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-15vs WESF:Westfit:LuneauLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Jeppson / Carolynn Crabtree vs Juana Luneau / Jaclyn Race3-6, 3-6
2024-04-20vs LFNT:LF Natick:WallachLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolynn Crabtree / Michelle Liang vs CariAnne Kreml / Simona Kylberger4-6, 3-6
2024-04-07vs WEY:Weymouth:CarrollWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Bacalla / Marybeth Liang vs Alison Albers / Elizabeth Straub2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-06vs LFNT:LF Natick:WallachLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarybeth Liang / Dana Bacalla vs Simona Kylberger / Jenna Schmid7-6, 0-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
4.48
Michelle Liang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Pamela Jeppson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.42
Marybeth Liang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.40
Dana Bacalla
published 5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marybeth Liang + Michelle Liang8360% games+8.2% vs expected
Carolynn Crabtree + Michelle Liang4257% games+7.4% vs expected
Dana Bacalla + Marybeth Liang3245% games−4.9% vs expected
Carolynn Crabtree + Pamela Jeppson21137% games−7.8% vs expected
Dana Bacalla + Pamela Jeppson0631% games−8.6% vs expected
Dana Bacalla + Carolynn Crabtree123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carolynn Crabtree
118W–46L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.52
Michelle Liang
73W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%55%45%
4.48
5
Pamela Jeppson
155W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.46
Marybeth Liang
109W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.42
5
Dana Bacalla
48W–39L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.