Teams

Phillippi/18/4.0/M/Pelican

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Maxwell Agnew
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published
Andrew McQuaid
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.73
Keith West
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.65
Robert Humphreys
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
David Butler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.54
Daniel Butler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
John Hearn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Eric Daigle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Garrett Phillippi
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Jack Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Keith Krebs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Keith Laterrade
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Kevin Phayer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Groeneveld
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Ryan Fournier
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Ellis + Maxwell Agnew5073% gamesnot enough data
David Butler + Daniel Butler404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maxwell Agnew
18W–2L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Andrew McQuaid
5W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keith West
24W–9L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Robert Humphreys
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
David Butler
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Daniel Butler
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
John Hearn
12W–4L career · 10 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Eric Daigle
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Garrett Phillippi
8W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jack Ellis
19W–3L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keith Krebs
10W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keith Laterrade
14W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Phayer
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Groeneveld
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Fournier
22W–5L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.