Teams

DThayaprasat (Queens)

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-23vs DPagano/APatrocino (Lifetime)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnna Hitchins / Caroline Pickup vs Megan Griffin / Corine Danesis6-4, 6-3
2025-07-16vs JVarn (Palisades)Won 20
W#2 DoublesCallie Schmit / Darri Thayaprasat vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHolly Natwick / Caroline Pickup vs Nataliya Rubanenko / Jane Sickles6-2, 7-6
2025-07-08vs JVarn (Palisades)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnnika Juergens / Laine Parker Horvath vs Teodora Doncheva / Tanya Hecht3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCaroline Frank / Anna Hitchins vs Sandy Mullis / Jane Sickles6-4, 6-3
2025-06-11vs DPagano/APatrocino (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHolly Natwick / Caroline Pickup vs Corine Danesis / Megan Griffin2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-04vs JVarn (Palisades)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCarling Deehr / Laine Parker Horvath vs Kindell Schmitt / MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCallie Schmit / Brittany Simpson vs Jordan Bowers / Jessica Varn6-2, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
4.58
Callie Schmit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.56
Cassandra Wincek
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 5
4.51
Caroline Frank
published 4.5
4.42
Darri Thayaprasat
published 4.5
4.26
Brittany Simpson
published 4.5
Anna Hitchins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
4.20
Laine Parker Horvath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Caroline Pickup
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
4.06
Mary Beth Huffman
published
3.68
Holly Natwick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Hitchins + Holly Natwick4166% gamesnot enough data
Holly Natwick + Caroline Pickup314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carson Rose Tennyson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.60
5
Callie Schmit
60W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.58
5
Cassandra Wincek
101W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.56
4.5
Caroline Frank
22W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.51
4.5
Darri Thayaprasat
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Brittany Simpson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Anna Hitchins
96W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hannah English Rahill
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
4.25
Laine Parker Horvath
50W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
4
Caroline Pickup
245W–112L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.08
Mary Beth Huffman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Holly Natwick
85W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.