Teams

No Strings Attached

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

20 players · average NTRP 3.71 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-07-01Won 20
W#1 SinglesJee Hur vs Kiley Holt6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Gunn vs Stacey Walker6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2024-06-26vs Sugar & Slice - 18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMaureen Earl / Maryrose Willadsen vs Meg Markley / Leslie Koppenhafer3-6, 1-6
2024-06-24vs AlleygatorsWon 21
W#1 SinglesJee Hur vs Suzanne Baran7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Gunn vs Sydney Crabtree2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaryrose Willadsen / Andrea Reynolds vs Beth Calvo / Kristen Jacobs1-6, 1-6
2024-06-19vs Eagle GalsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJee Hur vs Lindsay Hemmer6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaryrose Willadsen / Dawn Crochet vs Monica Reagan / Rhonda Curry5-7, 3-6
2024-06-17vs Tennisity 18Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJee Hur vs Ada Hansen3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaryrose Willadsen / Maureen Earl vs Kathy Christensen / Christeena Sevy3-6, 0-6
2024-06-12vs HillcrestLost 01
L#1 SinglesMaryrose Willadsen vs Katie Scanlan1-6, 3-6
2024-06-10Won 10
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Gunn vs Kristie Thompson6-4, 6-2
2024-05-29vs Net ResultsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDina Bostock / Mary Burke vs Lisa Trujillo-Dunn / Adair Holden4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJee Hur vs Patricia Gastanaga7-6
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Gunn vs Lana van Artsdalen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-22vs Fuzzy BallsWon 20
W#1 SinglesJee Hur vs Sonia Ivanova6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJacqueline Gunn vs Alexandra Owens6-4, 6-4
2024-05-20vs OverServed 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDina Bostock / Mary Chodroff vs Ashley Tribble / Beth Lassen2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Jacqueline Gunn
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Mary Parsons
published 4
3.64
Lexi Bruneel
published 4
3.59
Christine Elwer
published 4
3.58
Mary Burke
published 4
3.49
Dina Bostock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Chrissy Rose
published 3.5
3.42
Dawn Crochet
published 3.5
3.42
Hailey Smith
published 3.5
3.29
Mary Chodroff
published 3.5
3.23
Andrea Reynolds
published 3.5
3.21
Nelda Denton
published
3.20
Karie Pappani
published 3.5
3.09
Mary Adcox
published 3.5
3.07
Cassie Swanson
published 3.5
Jee Hur
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kelly Haskell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Maryrose Willadsen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Maureen Earl
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Tracie Munds
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Adcox + Mary Parsons7269% games+8.2% vs expected
Mary Burke + Dawn Crochet13956% games+7.7% vs expected
Mary Burke + Dina Bostock161457% games+2.7% vs expected
Mary Burke + Mary Adcox111750% games+2.5% vs expected
Hailey Smith + Chrissy Rose8751% games+2.5% vs expected
Dawn Crochet + Christine Elwer5549% games+1.9% vs expected
Mary Adcox + Dawn Crochet4949% games+1.7% vs expected
Mary Chodroff + Mary Adcox111646% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacqueline Gunn
37W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Mary Parsons
169W–125L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Lexi Bruneel
26W–31L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Christine Elwer
156W–133L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Mary Burke
151W–103L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Dina Bostock
42W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Chrissy Rose
106W–62L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Dawn Crochet
170W–181L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Hailey Smith
97W–110L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Mary Chodroff
115W–104L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Nelda Denton
88W–106L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Karie Pappani
153W–139L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Mary Adcox
151W–195L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cassie Swanson
99W–108L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Jee Hur
45W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Haskell
78W–129L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maryrose Willadsen
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Earl
64W–110L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracie Munds
56W–46L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.