Teams

Miami/Lamis/55&over7.0M

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 55 & Over - Spring · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.29 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-12vs Friedman (Ron Ehmann)Split 11
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Sananez / EDUARDO RIOS vs Luis Rodriguez / Eduardo Thompson4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCarlos Hernandez / Nicholas Lamis vs Lane Mitzenmacher / Christopher Kurtz6-1, 6-1
2024-03-05vs Leon (Deering Bay)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEDUARDO RIOS / Carmelo Rubio vs Thierry Moser / Tony Blank0-6, 2-6
2024-02-20vs Friedman (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Tichacek / Luther Mathews vs Raul Moskovitz / Douglas Shapiro6-0, 6-2
2024-02-13vs Leon (Deering Bay)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLuther Mathews / Mike Tichacek vs Tony Blank / Thierry Moser3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-30vs Friedman (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#2 DoublesEduardo Alizo / Mike Tichacek vs Ruben Leyva / Jeff Sones6-2, 7-5
2024-01-23vs Leon (Deering Bay)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEduardo Alizo / Nicholas Lamis vs Frank DeValdivielso Jr / Paulo Zampietro3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Sananez / Scott Lehman vs Tony Blank / Jeffrey Fenton5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Julio Batista vs Christian Philco / Clay Campbell6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Scott Lehman
published
EDUARDO RIOS
published 3.5
3.24
Emilio Zapata
published 3.5
3.13
Alejandro Sananez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Anders Madsen
published 3.5
2.91
Carmelo Rubio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Nicholas Lamis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Mike Tichacek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Vincent Turturro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Tichacek + Carmelo Rubio404 matchesnot enough data
Mike Tichacek + Alejandro Sananez213 matchesnot enough data
Mike Tichacek + Nicholas Lamis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Lehman
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
EDUARDO RIOS
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Emilio Zapata
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Alejandro Sananez
47W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Anders Madsen
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Carmelo Rubio
254W–234L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Nicholas Lamis
53W–135L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.62
3
Mike Tichacek
298W–203L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Vincent Turturro
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.