Teams

TCT:Club Ed 5.0:Pagano/Lubchansky

2022 SCT Adult 40 & Over Men · 5.0 Men (non-advancing) - 1

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-02-27vs CP:5.0 Spinackers:FrankWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexander Teixeira / Adrian Louw vs William Seward / Gregory Vadasdi6-4, 5-2
W#2 DoublesRick Lopez / Lawrence Hirsch vs Andrew Frank / Neil Collins6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-12-19vs CP:5.0 Spinackers:FrankWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexander Teixeira / John Pagano vs Todd Gordon / Gregory Vadasdi6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRick Lopez / Lawrence Hirsch vs Andrew Frank / Neil Collins6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.0 Men (non-advancing) - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCT:Club Ed 5.0:Pagano/Lubchansky0131329
2NC:Net Assets:Mueller0113638
3CP:5.0 Spinackers:Frank02351281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Lawrence Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Adrian Louw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brad Norton
published 4.5
Alan Pouyat
published
John Pagano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ross Raggio
published
Steven Lubchansky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrian Louw + Rick Lopez5066% games+14.2% vs expected
Alan Pouyat + Adrian Louw4648% games+2.3% vs expected
Alan Pouyat + Rick Lopez7259% games+1.5% vs expected
Lawrence Hirsch + Rick Lopez6259% gamesnot enough data
Steven Lubchansky + Ross Raggio134 matchesnot enough data
Steven Lubchansky + Rick Lopez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lawrence Hirsch
70W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Adrian Louw
35W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Brad Norton
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Alan Pouyat
21W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Pagano
24W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Rick Lopez
35W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ross Raggio
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Lubchansky
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.