Teams

CP:5.0 Spinackers:Frank

2022 SCT Adult 40 & Over Men · 5.0 Men (non-advancing) - 1

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-02-27vs TCT:Club Ed 5.0:Pagano/LubchanskyLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Seward / Gregory Vadasdi vs Alexander Teixeira / Adrian Louw4-6, 2-5
L#2 DoublesAndrew Frank / Neil Collins vs Rick Lopez / Lawrence Hirsch7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-01-16vs NC:Net Assets:MuellerWon 21
L#1 DoublesGregory Vadasdi / Todd Gordon vs Brad Breakstone / Tom Givone3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Frank / Neil Collins vs Michael Mueller / Alfred Culliford4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Seward / Jeffrey Peterson vs John Flaherty / Rambabu Vallabhajosula2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-12-19vs TCT:Club Ed 5.0:Pagano/LubchanskyLost 02
L#1 DoublesTodd Gordon / Gregory Vadasdi vs Alexander Teixeira / John Pagano4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Frank / Neil Collins vs Rick Lopez / Lawrence Hirsch4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.0 Men (non-advancing) - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCT:Club Ed 5.0:Pagano/Lubchansky0131329
2NC:Net Assets:Mueller0113638
3CP:5.0 Spinackers:Frank02351281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Peter Bailey
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
Andrew Frank
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
Edward Trask
published 4.5
4.16
Gregory Vadasdi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.76
Mitchell Berger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
William Seward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Vadasdi + Andrew Frank1642% games−5.1% vs expected
Andrew Frank + Peter Bailey1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Bailey
66W–54L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Andrew Frank
26W–60L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Edward Trask
2W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Gregory Vadasdi
18W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
4.16
Mitchell Berger
70W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
William Seward
5W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.