Teams

TLBBarber-McCue/Edgemoor

2022 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-04vs TLSMalmstrom/WestportLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Takes / Julia Mueller vs Crystal Regan / Melinda Urban2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Dunn / Katherine Karnatz vs Ann Murphy / Jennifer Johnston4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNatalie Hallman / Debra Haines vs Shannon Malmstrom / Jackie Wander4-6, 4-6
2022-07-28vs TLCStanford/RRLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Takes / Leah Rand vs Meredith Ortiz / Carol Hamel3-6, 4-6
2022-07-21vs TLLSchacher/TrumpLost 12
L#1 DoublesEara Woods / Julia Mueller vs Lisa Schacher / Keri Norcross3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBethany Barber / Sheila Pensler vs Allison Nelin / Jessica Babington1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebra Haines / Natalie Hallman vs Carol Hadzicki / Kasey Daley6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-14vs TLWGO-Goodwin/Holbrook Tri Thur amLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeah Rand / Shelly McCue vs Maria Solorzano / Monaliza Onia6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDawn Andiloro / Katherine Karnatz vs Kathy Murphy / Lori Downey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebra Haines / Natalie Hallman vs Karen Little / Lori Daniel6-1, 6-0
2022-07-07vs TLRSica-Sheehan/TrumpSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulia Mueller / Katherine Karnatz vs Carrie Blackwell / Catherine Gish4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Dunn / Denise Takes vs Ann Baker / Alison Cooper6-1, 6-0
2022-06-30vs TLHHughes/JettonLost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn Andiloro / Shelly McCue vs Amy Light / Andrea McRorie1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBethany Barber / Brenda Kadlecik vs Heidi Poulton / Natalie Reid6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDebra Haines / Natalie Hallman vs Gina van Nortwick / Renae Shehane4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-23vs TLAWages/RRWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulia Mueller / Leah Rand vs Amy Ward / Leslie Walters Adams2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Dunn / Katherine Karnatz vs Anne Wages / Kendrick Anderson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNatalie Hallman / Heather White vs Holly Ridgway / Andrea Venus6-3, 6-4
2022-06-09vs T-LLHolmes/PeninsulaLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Andiloro / Shelly McCue vs Kim Kelly Senff / Elizabeth Johnson1-6, 2-6
2022-06-02vs TLBWelch/JettonWon 21
L#1 DoublesShelly McCue / Eara Woods vs Mariel Carr / Leslie Crane5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBethany Barber / Denise Takes vs Beth Welch / Susan York6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebra Haines / Natalie Hallman vs Amanda Burke / Lori Hissom6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Dawn Andiloro
published 3.5
3.34
Leah Rand
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Bethany Barber
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.08
Katherine Karnatz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.07
Julia Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.06
Sheila Pensler
published
2.83
Shelly McCue
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.82
Brenda Kadlecik
published 3
2.82
Denise Takes
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.26
Natalie Hallman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Takes + Katherine Karnatz11856% games+10.6% vs expected
Bethany Barber + Katherine Karnatz251755% games−0.3% vs expected
Denise Takes + Shelly McCue253647% games−5.0% vs expected
Julia Mueller + Denise Takes31140% games−10.8% vs expected
Julia Mueller + Katherine Karnatz6653% gamesnot enough data
Denise Takes + Bethany Barber6555% gamesnot enough data
Julia Mueller + Leah Rand4648% gamesnot enough data
Denise Takes + Brenda Kadlecik1938% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Andiloro
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Leah Rand
84W–96L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Bethany Barber
137W–117L career · 8 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Katherine Karnatz
190W–172L career · 8 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Julia Mueller
93W–161L career · 6 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Sheila Pensler
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Shelly McCue
70W–117L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Brenda Kadlecik
41W–70L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Denise Takes
125W–152L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
2.5
Natalie Hallman
57W–78L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.