Teams

TLCStanford/RR

2022 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-28vs TLBBarber-McCue/EdgemoorWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeredith Ortiz / Carol Hamel vs Denise Takes / Leah Rand6-3, 6-4
2022-07-23vs TLAWages/RRWon 10
W#1 DoublesJann Debord / Carol Hamel vs Elise Wehrum / Julie Lyerly6-3, 7-5
2022-07-14vs T-LLHolmes/PeninsulaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeredith Ortiz / Jann Debord vs Lori Holmes / Jennifer Saxton7-5, 6-1
2022-07-07vs TLBWelch/JettonLost 02
L#1 DoublesBridgette Ashbrook / Meredith Ortiz vs Teri Deuel / Lori Kitchens4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Blevins / Beth Schleck vs Christin Darnell / Beth Welch6-7, 2-6
2022-06-30vs TLSMalmstrom/WestportWon 10
W#1 DoublesJann Debord / Meredith Ortiz vs Charlotte Rorech / Jennifer Johnston6-0, 6-1
2022-06-23vs TLHHughes/JettonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Hamel / Bridgette Ashbrook vs Amy Light / Alicia Bowman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-09vs TLLSchacher/TrumpLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Schleck / Jann Debord vs Lisa Schacher / Keri Norcross3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesJann Debord / Beth Schleck vs Annette Mootilal / Cindy Mexcur6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCara Stanford / Heather Fernandez vs Lori Downey / Patricia Starnes7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jann Debord
published
3.34
Carol Hamel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Meredith Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.04
Beth Schleck
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Kelly Gentry
published
2.90
Jennifer Blevins
published
2.90
Courtney Seiter
published 3
2.86
Cara Stanford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Lauren Verlander
published
Elizabeth Breen
published 3
Kathryn Love
published
Sue Hayes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cara Stanford + Beth Schleck2352% gamesnot enough data
Cara Stanford + Meredith Ortiz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jann Debord
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Carol Hamel
78W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Meredith Ortiz
123W–106L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3
Beth Schleck
92W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
Kelly Gentry
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
Jennifer Blevins
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Courtney Seiter
9W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Cara Stanford
78W–55L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
Lauren Verlander
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Bridgette Ashbrook
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Breen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathryn Love
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Hayes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.