Teams

SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Voeffray

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring · Summer- SDNC

16 players · average NTRP 3.54 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-06-30vs SDNC 7.0 Miracosta/ SteigerwaldSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCheryl Shah / Kristin Voeffray vs Jill Twombly / Mary Beth Woulfe2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGayle Paddison / Sally Katz vs Shauna Shaddle / Kathy Colarusso6-4, 6-3
2026-06-16vs SDNC 7.0 Scripps S&RC/ McDonaldWon 10
W#3 DoublesJodie Simbolon / Kristin Voeffray vs Melanie Bowyer / Caresse Muir6-2, 6-3
2026-05-26vs SDNC 7.0 RBCTC/ CahanWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristin Voeffray / Alison Pasiut vs Jeri Edelen / Arlene Hasegawa6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSally Katz / Gayle Paddison vs Deborah Davies / Nancy Samuelsen7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · Summer- SDNC
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SDNC LLW WD 7.0 Miramar College/ Stern72161128226
2SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Voeffray6320721213
3SDNC 7.0 RPTC/ Havens6318923219
4SDNC 7.0 La Valle CC/ Preti63161124202
5SDNC 7.0 Kit Carson Park/ Yao-Garcia45141330227
6SDNC 7.0 Miracosta/ Steigerwald45131433252
7SDNC 7.0 Scripps S&RC/ McDonald45111634263
8SDNC 7.0 El Camino CC/ Piper45111636271
9SDNC 7.0 FRCC/ Wolgast2791839271
10SDNC 7.0 RBCTC/ Cahan2772042294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Gayle Paddison
published 4
3.52
3.44
Alison Pasiut
published 3.5
3.38
Junli Feng
published 3.5
3.36
Sharon Schwab
published 3.5
3.35
Ping Chen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Jodie Simbolon
published 3.5
3.33
Shelley Kuhle
published 3.5
3.31
Lynn Heiman
published 3.5
3.31
Molly Santistevan
published 3.5
3.30
Salma Ott
published 3.5
3.26
Cheryl Shah
published 3.5
3.18
Margo Skinner
published 3.5
3.09
Leslie Mereminsky
published 3.5
3.09
Kristin Voeffray
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sally Katz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Mcelhaney + Shelley Kuhle10264% games+9.8% vs expected
Margo Skinner + Molly Santistevan131051% games+1.0% vs expected
Junli Feng + Jodie Simbolon6453% games−2.6% vs expected
Sharon Schwab + Jacqueline Mcelhaney8251% games−4.0% vs expected
Leslie Mereminsky + Jodie Simbolon5254% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Mcelhaney + Alison Pasiut3452% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Mereminsky + Jacqueline Mcelhaney2446% gamesnot enough data
Jodie Simbolon + Ping Chen4260% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gayle Paddison
27W–37L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Jacqueline Mcelhaney
79W–46L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Alison Pasiut
36W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Junli Feng
90W–63L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Sharon Schwab
51W–48L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Ping Chen
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Jodie Simbolon
52W–54L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Shelley Kuhle
25W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Lynn Heiman
44W–43L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Molly Santistevan
24W–23L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Salma Ott
45W–32L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Cheryl Shah
41W–42L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Margo Skinner
13W–21L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Leslie Mereminsky
38W–36L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kristin Voeffray
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Sally Katz
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.