Teams

R-Goodwin Arctic Ice Thursday/NMP

2021-2022 Racquets & Jackets Doubles League · Women Division C (2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-02-01vs R-Hallman/EDGEMOOR Dare DoublesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Rorech / Norma Zitnik vs Mendy Iacone / Kathleen Kaake6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesArlene Ireland / Wendy Goodwin vs Brenda Kadlecik / Sarah Perro4-6, 5-7
2022-01-06vs R-Andiloro Ace Breakers/EdgemoorWon 10
W#2 DoublesArlene Ireland / Caroline Biedermann vs Beth Welch / Mary Laliberte6-3, 6-1
2021-12-16vs R-Mizicko Net Setters/PeninsulaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Dittemore / Norma Zitnik vs Lori Holmes / Melinda Little7-6, 6-3
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Rorech / Margaret Dittemore vs Crystal Regan / Melissa Collins4-6, 3-6
2021-12-02vs R-Papageorgiou Wise Aces/RRWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Kitchens / Norma Zitnik vs Meredith Ortiz / Megan McKinley6-4, 7-6
2021-11-18vs R-Hughes/Wilson/JettonLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Rorech / Nina Tracy vs Kelly Stamey / Jennifer Tammaro4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCaroline Biedermann / Arlene Ireland vs Lisa Druckenbrod / Karen Cooper3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division C (2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Nina Tracy
published
3.17
Norma Zitnik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Lori Kitchens
published
3.08
Katherine Karnatz
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Anette Solmaz
published 3.5
2.91
Margaret Dittemore
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.80
Arlene Ireland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Charlotte Rorech
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
2.55
Wendy Goodwin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norma Zitnik + Margaret Dittemore2342% gamesnot enough data
Norma Zitnik + Arlene Ireland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nina Tracy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Norma Zitnik
132W–136L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Lori Kitchens
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Katherine Karnatz
190W–172L career · 7 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Anette Solmaz
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Margaret Dittemore
52W–63L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Arlene Ireland
116W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Charlotte Rorech
22W–133L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Gina van Nortwick
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Wendy Goodwin
12W–26L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.