Teams

CP GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-18vs DTP GOLDLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Fulford / Glenn Junik vs Tim Hoy / David Stengel2-6, 4-6
2024-07-11vs KC-RH NAVYWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngus Campbell / John Randall vs Pat Corbitt / Erhardt Werth4-6, 5-1
2024-07-04vs KC-RH GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGary Beck / John Randall vs Robert Brigham / David Frederick7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLen Green / Glenn Junik vs John Longo / David Doessel4-6, 2-6
2024-06-27vs DTC NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Randall / Gary Beck vs Lawrence Gabler / Darryl Wisnia6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Glenn Junik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
John Randall
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dennis McGeein
published 3.5
3.23
Gary Beck
published
3.19
Jack Fredrickson
published 3.5
3.13
Angus Campbell
published 3.5
2.67
Mark Fulford
published
George Cummings
published
Jay Boisseau
published
Len Green
published
Richard Winkel
published
Timothy Gordon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Junik + John Randall7165% gamesnot enough data
Gary Beck + John Randall3348% gamesnot enough data
Gary Beck + Glenn Junik224 matchesnot enough data
Gary Beck + Len Green224 matchesnot enough data
Gary Beck + Jack Fredrickson213 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Gordon + Jay Boisseau213 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Gordon + George Cummings303 matchesnot enough data
Glenn Junik + Dennis McGeein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Glenn Junik
28W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
John Randall
75W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Dennis McGeein
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gary Beck
21W–28L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Jack Fredrickson
43W–24L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Angus Campbell
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Mark Fulford
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
George Cummings
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jay Boisseau
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Len Green
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Winkel
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Gordon
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.