Teams

KC-RH GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-01vs NJ NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Jansons / Glen SHERMAN vs Tim Doherty / Farhad Noorbakhsh6-7
2024-07-25vs KC-RH NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Jansons / Michael McClurkin vs Reuben Ybarra / James Morrison1-4
2024-07-06vs NJ NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesDave Erickson / John Jansons vs Nathaniel Strout / Farhad Noorbakhsh3-6, 2-6
2024-07-04vs CP GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Jansons / William Daniels vs Jay Boisseau / Timothy Gordon2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Ken Reed
published
3.62
John Longo
published
Glen SHERMAN
published 3.5
3.18
Robert Brigham
published
3.10
William Daniels
published
3.09
Dave Erickson
published 3.5
David Doessel
published 3
2.72
John Jansons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jim Mantele
published
Michael McClurkin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael McClurkin + John Jansons81144% games−21.6% vs expected
Glen SHERMAN + David Doessel6946% gamesnot enough data
Jim Mantele + Ken Reed7160% gamesnot enough data
David Doessel + Dave Erickson1539% gamesnot enough data
John Jansons + William Daniels2348% gamesnot enough data
John Jansons + Dave Erickson2341% gamesnot enough data
John Jansons + Ken Reed1450% gamesnot enough data
Robert Brigham + John Jansons044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Reed
67W–63L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
John Longo
56W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
Glen SHERMAN
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Brigham
32W–52L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
William Daniels
28W–35L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dave Erickson
7W–23L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
David Doessel
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
John Jansons
37W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
Jim Mantele
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael McClurkin
32W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.