Teams

NJ NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-08vs DTP GOLDLost 02
L#2 DoublesMike Stewart / Nathaniel Strout vs Bruce Anderson / Allan Wainwright0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTim Doherty / Farhad Noorbakhsh vs Tim Hoy / David Stengel1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-08-01vs KC-RH GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarnes Goutermout / Nathaniel Strout vs Robert Brigham / David Frederick0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTim Doherty / Farhad Noorbakhsh vs John Jansons / Glen SHERMAN7-6
2024-07-25vs CP GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesMike Stewart / Nathaniel Strout vs Dennis McGeein / Mark Fulford1-6, 1-6
2024-07-18vs KC-RH NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesChet Paris / Nathaniel Strout vs James Lord / James Morrison6-3, 6-4
2024-07-11vs DTC NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesNathaniel Strout / Farhad Noorbakhsh vs Lawrence Gabler / Thomas Chalk4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-07-06vs KC-RH GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesNathaniel Strout / Farhad Noorbakhsh vs Dave Erickson / John Jansons6-3, 6-2
2024-07-04vs DTP GOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesNathaniel Strout / John Mullins vs Rick Lannon / Allan Wainwright6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarnes Goutermout / Farhad Noorbakhsh vs Robert Hall / Eddie Sierra7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Nathaniel Strout
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.17
Farhad Noorbakhsh
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
John Mullins
published
2.98
Chet Paris
published 3.5
James Cherney
published
Mike Stewart
published
Steve Gillespie
published
Tim Doherty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathaniel Strout + Farhad Noorbakhsh3349% gamesnot enough data
Nathaniel Strout + John Mullins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nathaniel Strout
43W–53L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Farhad Noorbakhsh
51W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
John Mullins
10W–32L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Chet Paris
3W–14L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Barnes Goutermout
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
James Cherney
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Stewart
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Gillespie
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Doherty
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.