Teams

SFV - Simply Smashing 3.5

2022 SoCal Fall Doubles 18+ SFV · SFV - Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-12-18vs SFV - Love 2 AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesCecilia Mikaelian / Olivia Olivares vs Wangie Pineda / Marcy Marder4-6, 5-7
2022-12-03vs SFV - Team PlayersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenny Isaacson / Olivia Olivares vs Margery Teller / Regina Marchand6-4, 6-1
2022-11-20vs SFV - FireballsLost 01
L#3 DoublesOlivia Olivares / Ashley Bol vs Ann Hall / Beverly Wilkerson3-6, 0-6
2022-10-30vs SFV - Kiss My AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesOlivia Olivares / Brenda Parnell vs Teri Gustafson / Kari Shaffer2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
3.72
Jenny Isaacson
published
3.35
Kio Novina
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Brenda Parnell
published 3.5
3.15
Yoko Kanayama
published
3.13
Theresa Sterling
published
3.04
Mary Anna Noveck
published
2.82
Ashley Bol
published 3
ANALILY PARK
published 3
2.63
Allison Mac Ewan
published 3
2.63
Vanessa Nelson
published
Olivia Olivares
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olivia Olivares + Brenda Parnell241353% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Mikaelian
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Jenny Isaacson
22W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Kio Novina
164W–117L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Brenda Parnell
37W–22L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Yoko Kanayama
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Theresa Sterling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Mary Anna Noveck
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Ashley Bol
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
ANALILY PARK
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Allison Mac Ewan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Vanessa Nelson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Olivia Olivares
56W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.