Teams

Slaman (Royal Palm)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Meredith Gussin
published
3.35
Wendy Coles
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.28
Lourdes Salazar
published
3.25
Liliana Cook
published
3.17
Natalie Carlos
published
3.17
Eve-Alice Stoller
published 3.5
3.02
Josette Lahoud
published
3.02
3.00
Corinne Kayal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Vivian Vila
usually #4 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.90
Dianne Stebbins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.89
Shelia Barreto
published
2.88
Jeanne Spital
published
Chau Pyatt
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Cynthia Slaman
published 3
2.49
Ana Alarcon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published 3
Jennifer Oliveira
published
LINDA YUSMAN WIRTH
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josette Lahoud + Jeanne Spital1422% games−15.7% vs expected
Wendy Coles + Liliana Cook5064% gamesnot enough data
Vivian Vila + Ana Alarcon044 matchesnot enough data
Vivian Vila + Chau Pyatt134 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Coles + Joanne Rosenbluth Rigl224 matchesnot enough data
Chau Pyatt + Joanne Rosenbluth Rigl134 matchesnot enough data
Lourdes Salazar + Liliana Cook224 matchesnot enough data
Josette Lahoud + Natalie Carlos044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Gussin
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Wendy Coles
72W–99L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Lourdes Salazar
76W–58L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Liliana Cook
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
Natalie Carlos
1W–20L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Eve-Alice Stoller
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Josette Lahoud
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Joanne Rosenbluth Rigl
54W–84L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Corinne Kayal
18W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.00
Vivian Vila
43W–105L career · 7 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
3.5
Dianne Stebbins
31W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.90
Shelia Barreto
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.89
Jeanne Spital
1W–18L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Chau Pyatt
12W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cynthia Slaman
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Ana Alarcon
36W–105L career · 7 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Jennifer Oliveira
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
LINDA YUSMAN WIRTH
31W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.