Teams

BOYLE PK CW7.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-24vs RAFAEL RC CW7.5A-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth Crittenden / Nancy Tuhtan vs Joanna Brook / Lisa Tornello7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Tuatini / Lucia Wallace vs Nhat Johnston / Angela Liu6-2, 6-2
2025-10-16vs RAFAEL RC CW7.5A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Crittenden / Christine Neumeier vs Amy Atherton / Tracey Porter6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLucia Wallace / Colleen Sonneborn vs Sharon Klein / Margarita Wear6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelinda Whitmore / Marjorie Swain vs Petra Jacobson / Jennifer Rice3-6, 4-6
2025-10-03vs RAFAEL RC CW7.5A-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesLilian Kim / Tori Herzog vs Susan Ginwala / Jennifer Rice7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCandace Davenport / Amelia Weir vs Ashley Hellyer / Nhat Johnston4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-23vs RAFAEL RC CW7.5A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesLilian Kim / Tori Herzog vs Amy Atherton / Hayley Burner7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTina Skouras / Melinda Whitmore vs Meredith Pavia / Joanna Brook6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarjorie Swain / Karolina Gachowska vs Petra Jacobson / Ashley Hellyer2-6, 3-6
2025-09-08vs RAFAEL RC CW7.5A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesCandace Davenport / Christine Neumeier vs Amy Atherton / Petra Jacobson6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnne Sullivan / Melinda Whitmore vs Margarita Wear / Lisa Tornello6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLucia Wallace / Colleen Sonneborn vs Joanna Brook / Ashley Hellyer6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lilian Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Beth Crittenden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Natalie Batlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Anne Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Marjorie Swain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Candace Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Tina Skouras
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Rita Williams
published
3.55
Lucia Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Christine Neumeier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Colleen Sonneborn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Nancy Tuhtan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Carolyn Tuatini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Tori Herzog
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Karolina Gachowska
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Melinda Whitmore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Stephanie Sadow
published
3.13
Nina Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Amelia Weir
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Sonneborn + Nina Kim7356% games+9.6% vs expected
Melinda Whitmore + Karolina Gachowska4164% games+9.4% vs expected
Nancy Tuhtan + Tori Herzog7654% games+1.7% vs expected
Melinda Whitmore + Tori Herzog9553% games+1.6% vs expected
Tina Skouras + Anne Sullivan224 matchesnot enough data
Beth Crittenden + Lucia Wallace314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Tuhtan + Carolyn Tuatini213 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Tuhtan + Colleen Sonneborn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lilian Kim
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.81
4
Beth Crittenden
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Natalie Batlin
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Anne Sullivan
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Marjorie Swain
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Candace Davenport
20W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Tina Skouras
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Rita Williams
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Lucia Wallace
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Christine Neumeier
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Colleen Sonneborn
28W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Nancy Tuhtan
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Carolyn Tuatini
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Tori Herzog
29W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Karolina Gachowska
25W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Melinda Whitmore
17W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Stephanie Sadow
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Nina Kim
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Amelia Weir
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.