Teams

CV-Mission Hills/Polisky/David

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 9.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-02-19vs CV-Indian Wells TG/S Fleming/BullsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnita Kamouri / Vickki Schlappi vs Kathleen Bradley / Kristin Smith3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLis Andrade / Andrea Bowen vs Maria Crema / Thelma Sahara6-4, 6-4
2024-02-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Bowen / Andrea Polisky vs Carole Myser / Laura Lund0-6, 0-6
2024-01-22Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie David / Elizabeth Kuhle vs Robin Richie / Mistie Iseman6-3, 3-1
L#3 DoublesVickki Schlappi / Anita Kamouri vs Carole Myser / Kimberly Skorupa3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-01-08vs CV-Indian Wells TG/S Fleming/BullsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLis Andrade / Elizabeth Kuhle vs Barbara Eriksson / Sheree Green6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrea Bowen / Tammy Peltzer vs Anne Medzegian / Cheryl Thoresen6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Gail Warden
published 4.5
4.09
Anita Kamouri
published 4
4.09
Elizabeth Kuhle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Vickki Schlappi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Andrea Bowen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Andrea Polisky
published 4
Margaret Shepp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Warden + Margaret Shepp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gail Warden
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Anita Kamouri
16W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
4.09
4.5
Elizabeth Kuhle
77W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Vickki Schlappi
67W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Andrea Bowen
25W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Andrea Polisky
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Shepp
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.