Teams

Team 8 Zaret - Z's Last Chance Saloon

2024 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-06-23vs MidAtlantic/Pham/Adult18&Over4.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Armstrong / Joong Min vs Thuan Lai / Quang Nguyen3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Rosenblum / Jeff Dannick vs Phuong Tran / Hao Du3-6, 6-6
2024-06-18vs Team 2 WHO IS WE?Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Armstrong / Jeff Dannick vs Jesse Cebulash / Taylor Murphy7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBarry Dickman / Joong Min vs Arul Josely Samdas / Vipul Chawla6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesRyan Rohn vs Tyson Zhang0-6, 2-6
2024-06-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesRyan Rohn vs Jonathan Kim7-5, 0-2
2024-06-01vs Team 11 Team VittoriaLost 13
W#1 DoublesMike Burgoyne / Quentin Carter vs John Kim / Ricardo Scarlatella6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRyan Rohn vs William Doan6-7
L#2 DoublesBarry Dickman / Joong Min vs Khai Ngo / Arvind Jairam2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNathaniel Quisbert / Jeff Dannick vs Joshua Strunk / Rodney Carpenter1-6, 4-6
2024-05-25vs Team 7 MaddiLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoong Min / Mike Burgoyne vs Senthil Kumar Seetharaman / Elango Rengasamy5-7, 4-3
L#2 DoublesJeff Buhl / Jeff Dannick vs Rajakumar Chithambaram / Sriram Gopalakrishnan3-6, 3-6
2024-05-20vs Team 6 ChoiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoong Min / David Todd vs Suchul Lee / Clifford Hwang6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRyan Rohn vs David Kim1-6, 2-6
2024-05-12vs Team 10 CourtmastersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMike Burgoyne / Quentin Carter vs Vijeaswaran Velusamy / Gautham Swaminathan6-7, 5-3
L#2 DoublesBarry Dickman / Jeff Dannick vs Jay Yee / Jonathan Slinkard2-6, 0-6
2024-04-28vs Team 5 Stringing WinnersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Todd / Joong Min vs Rohit Munjal / Doan Nguyen6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMike Burgoyne / Jeff Dannick vs Jason Hecker / Brian Partlow5-7, 3-2
2024-04-21vs Team 9 ChallengersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Burgoyne / Quentin Carter vs Ben Moss / Faizan Mumtaz6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRyan Rohn vs Brendan Gilfillan3-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJordan Bentley / Barry Dickman vs Keith Bown / THUC NGUYEN6-4, 7-6
2024-04-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesQuentin Carter / Mike Burgoyne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
3.98
Quentin Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
David Todd
published 4
3.86
Jordan Bentley
published
3.84
Michael Healy
published
3.80
Austin Wells
published 4
3.79
Brian Cheng
published 4
3.70
Ryan Rohn
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.69
Jeff Buhl
published
3.68
Joong Min
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Barry Dickman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jeff Rosenblum
published
3.66
William Wray
published
3.52
Jeff Dannick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.47
Jordan Glashow
published
Mike Burgoyne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Todd + Jordan Bentley4153% games−10.4% vs expected
Joong Min + Barry Dickman1837% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Dannick + Barry Dickman1738% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Rohn + Joong Min3258% gamesnot enough data
David Todd + Quentin Carter314 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Buhl + Jordan Bentley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Armstrong
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Quentin Carter
201W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
David Todd
58W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Jordan Bentley
23W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Michael Healy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Austin Wells
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Brian Cheng
25W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Ryan Rohn
242W–218L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Jeff Buhl
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Joong Min
61W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Barry Dickman
90W–123L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Jeff Rosenblum
40W–31L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
William Wray
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Jeff Dannick
38W–100L career · 6 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jordan Glashow
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Mike Burgoyne
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.