Teams

Cottonwood Club-Annunziata

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-06vs Sunpro-Westover/BarberSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Annunziata / Mindi Paskins vs Lori Curtis / Tiffany Ashman6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Collins / Kumru Uruk vs Sherston Faux / Kaylene Andrew7-5, 6-7
2024-07-30vs Ivory Ridge-Adams/WellsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Collins / Ann Weaver vs Tiffany Riley / Cecia Croft1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBeata Kieffer / Malisa Bowen vs Sara Madsen / Jamie Harris6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-23vs Salt Lake Tennis-RasmussenWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Annunziata / Carolyn Cottle vs Kathleen Sorenson / Ingrid Hansen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennie Bethers / Beata Kieffer vs Janine Nemelka / Elizabeth Harris-Johnson6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesMindi Paskins / Beata Kieffer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-09vs Red Ledges-ArchibaldWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Webster / Ann Weaver vs Laurie THOMSON / Annabelle Lang6-4, 6-4
2024-07-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJennie Bethers / Kumru Uruk vs Melissa Hofmann / Michelle Maxfield5-7, 2-6
2024-06-25vs Park City MARC-Baber/WrightSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJeanette Shepard / Ann Weaver vs Kristin Baber / Christine Rothkopf6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeata Kieffer / Celia Steele vs Deborah Leigh / Elizabeth Carrington7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-11vs Sports Mall-LyonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Annunziata / Michelle Cutler vs Kate Stalsberg / Maureen Russo6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jeanette Shepard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Taylor Haverkost
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
Angie Nelden
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
Beata Kieffer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Megan Reardon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Ann Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Michelle Cutler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Lauren Annunziata
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Jennie Bethers
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.17
Kelly Webster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.12
Celia Steele
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Kumru Uruk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Maria Lombardi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Carolyn Cottle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.06
Mindi Paskins
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.00
Malisa Bowen
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Sarah Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Webster + Beata Kieffer5163% games+13.1% vs expected
Angie Nelden + Taylor Haverkost6266% games+11.6% vs expected
Maria Lombardi + Jennie Bethers4159% games+10.9% vs expected
Jeanette Shepard + Lauren Annunziata4257% games+10.2% vs expected
Kumru Uruk + Kelly Webster1454% games+6.4% vs expected
Jeanette Shepard + Mindi Paskins12359% games+6.2% vs expected
Beata Kieffer + Mindi Paskins5260% games+4.0% vs expected
Ann Weaver + Kelly Webster8258% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeanette Shepard
195W–143L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Taylor Haverkost
138W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Angie Nelden
80W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Beata Kieffer
55W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Reardon
40W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Ann Weaver
84W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Michelle Cutler
149W–101L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Lauren Annunziata
136W–138L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Jennie Bethers
125W–120L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kelly Webster
196W–131L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Celia Steele
45W–79L career · 6 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Kumru Uruk
49W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Maria Lombardi
228W–163L career · 7 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Carolyn Cottle
113W–130L career · 6 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Mindi Paskins
238W–179L career · 5 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Malisa Bowen
182W–149L career · 9 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
Sarah Collins
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.