Teams

McCann

2026 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 5.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-07vs JakubikWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristen Harsha / Erika Trost vs Alexandria Agee / Bhargavi Kalaga6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLorena Valente vs Inese Williamson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Rice / Shelagh Meehan vs Danielle Desfosses / Miranda Bishard6-1, 6-4
2026-06-02vs JakubikLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrea Rice / Leanne Mos vs Hannah Stahl / Miranda Bishard4-6, 3-1
L#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Shannon Young6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-17vs JakubikWon 30
W#1 DoublesLorena Valente / Ekaterina Potapova vs Inese Williamson / Kendall Heitzner2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShayna Ginster vs Alexandria Agee6-4, 1-1
W#2 DoublesCecile Hult / Delphine Owen vs Casey Burdette / Bhargavi Kalaga6-7, 4-2
2026-05-09vs JakubikWon 21
W#1 DoublesLorena Valente / Marharita-Sophia Tavpash vs Angel Batkins / Miranda Bishard6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShayna Ginster vs Shannon Young2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCecile Hult / Shelagh Meehan vs Casey Burdette / Kendall Heitzner6-2, 6-0
2026-05-03vs JakubikLost 12
W#1 DoublesCecile Hult / Marharita-Sophia Tavpash vs Kendall Heitzner / Shannon Young6-2, 4-5
L#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Alexandria Agee5-7, 1-2
L#2 DoublesShelagh Meehan / Leanne Mos vs Hannah Stahl / Danielle Desfosses5-7, 3-2
2026-04-19vs JakubikWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarharita-Sophia Tavpash / Ekaterina Potapova vs Angel Batkins / Alexandria Agee6-1, 5-5
L#1 SinglesEve Helmer vs Shannon Young1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Rice / Erika Trost vs Inese Williamson / Danielle Desfosses6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs JakubikWon 21
W#1 DoublesCecile Hult / Ekaterina Potapova vs Miranda Bishard / Bhargavi Kalaga6-4, 5-1
W#1 SinglesShayna Ginster vs Inese Williamson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErika Trost / Eve Helmer vs Angel Batkins / Danielle Desfosses4-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs JakubikWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeanne Mos / Eve Helmer vs Hannah Stahl / Danielle Desfosses6-3, 3-4
W#1 SinglesShayna Ginster vs Inese Williamson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEkaterina Potapova / Delphine Owen vs Casey Burdette / Kendall Heitzner6-4, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McCann0816821175
2Jakubik0881630221

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Lorena Valente
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.83
Ekaterina Potapova
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.82
Andrea Rice
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.78
Cecile Hult
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
Delphine Owen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.64
Marharita-Sophia Tavpash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.63
Leanne Mos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.58
Christen Harsha
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.55
Erika Trost
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.53
Shayna Ginster
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.52
Shelagh Meehan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.49
Eve Helmer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.14
Elizabeth McCann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Trost + Eve Helmer12265% games+3.0% vs expected
Lorena Valente + Marharita-Sophia Tavpash303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorena Valente
12W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.83
5
Ekaterina Potapova
121W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.83
5
Andrea Rice
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Cecile Hult
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.78
5
Delphine Owen
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marharita-Sophia Tavpash
10W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
Leanne Mos
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
5
Christen Harsha
480W–135L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.58
5
Erika Trost
383W–193L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
5
Shayna Ginster
63W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.53
Shelagh Meehan
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.52
5
Eve Helmer
276W–134L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.49
Elizabeth McCann
35W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
4.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.