Teams

JTC-Jones-5.0 Wannabes

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.75 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-23vs SWW-TLTC-MoxleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesNick Jarvis / Ryan Meredith vs Nick Moxley / Kyle Schraeder1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDavin Hanton vs Matthew Huynh2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-17vs SWW-TLTC-MoxleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesNick Jarvis / Nathan Jones vs Richard Deitz / Callan Peterson3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDavin Hanton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-20vs SWW-TLTC-MoxleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesNick Jarvis / Davin Hanton vs Kyle Schraeder / Nick Moxley1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesWinston Ngo vs Matthew Huynh6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Cheong / Ryan Meredith vs Callan Peterson / Brian McPhee1-6, 2-6
2023-05-20vs NWW-MI-GoddardLost 01
L#1 SinglesWinston Ngo vs Christopher Elliott6-7, 3-6
2023-05-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesWinston Ngo / Richard Deitz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-22vs AYTC-HowardLost 01
L#1 SinglesWinston Ngo vs Vayum Arora1-6, 4-6
2023-04-21vs SWW-TLTC-MoxleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesNick Jarvis / Nathan Jones vs Callan Peterson / Nick Moxley1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesWinston Ngo vs Matthew Huynh6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavin Hanton / Michael Cheong vs Brian McPhee / Casey McCoy7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesWinston Ngo vs Julian Seneviratne6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesWinston Ngo vs Vicente Varas7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-TLTC-Moxley4084969
2JTC-Jones-5.0 Wannabes044817114

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.48 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Davin Hanton
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 5
4.58
Winston Ngo
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 5
4.43
Michael Cheong
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.24
Nick Jarvis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Nathan Jones
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Davin Hanton
37W–42L career · 10 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.66
5
Winston Ngo
42W–33L career · 7 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.58
4.5
Michael Cheong
158W–67L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
4.43
4.5
Nick Jarvis
25W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Nathan Jones
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.