Teams

Shoup

2026 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Spring Weeknight 40&over · 4.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-04vs BarronSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRees Oliver / Lance Hunter vs Anthony Blake / Richard Harris6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJim Blalock vs Mark Barron6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMark Ferguson / Richard Calverley vs Zachary Nelson / Steven Josey5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRicky Shoup / Thom Houston vs Duane Trahan / Jason Vest2-6, 4-6
2026-04-28vs BarronWon 40
W#1 DoublesRicky Shoup / Russell Gache vs Brad Boswell / Bryan Boswell6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRichard Calverley vs Patrick Mills6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesThom Houston / Mark Moore vs Mark Barron / Shawn Bradley6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohn O'Brien / Chase Robertson vs Richard Harris / Anthony Blake6-2, 6-3
2026-04-21vs BarronWon 40
W#1 DoublesLucas Linares / Nevin Langdon vs Mark Barron / Patrick Mills6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndy Beckman vs Shawn Bradley6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn O'Brien / Mark Moore vs Zachary Nelson / Steven Josey6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLance Hunter / Chase Robertson vs Bryan Boswell / Brad Boswell6-2, 6-3
2026-04-13vs BarronWon 40
W#1 DoublesNevin Langdon / Lucas Linares vs Duane Trahan / Zachary Nelson6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAndy Beckman vs Shawn Bradley6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRees Oliver / Chase Robertson vs Jason Vest / Steven Josey6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteven Burdette / Lance Hunter vs Mark Barron / Patrick Mills6-1, 6-1
2026-04-13vs BarronWon 40
W#1 DoublesRussell Gache / Mark Ferguson vs Shawn Bradley / Patrick Mills6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJim Blalock vs Mark Barron6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRees Oliver / Richard Calverley vs Anthony Blake / Richard Harris6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRicky Shoup / Thom Houston vs Duane Trahan / Jason Vest6-2, 6-3
2026-04-06vs BarronWon 40
W#1 DoublesJim Blalock / Mark Ferguson vs Shawn Bradley / Zachary Nelson6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSteven Burdette vs Patrick Mills6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLance Hunter / Ricky Shoup vs Brad Boswell / Bryan Boswell6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRussell Gache / Chase Robertson vs Mark Barron / Duane Trahan6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Chase Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Richard Calverley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.24
Nevin Langdon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Lucas Linares
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
John O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Les Steiner
published
4.12
Rees Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Russell Gache
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Andy Beckman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Lance Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.00
Ricky Shoup
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.97
Mark Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Jim Blalock
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Thom Houston
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Steven Burdette
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucas Linares + Nevin Langdon8065% games+7.7% vs expected
Thom Houston + Chase Robertson4165% gamesnot enough data
Steven Burdette + Jim Blalock044 matchesnot enough data
John O'Brien + Chase Robertson314 matchesnot enough data
Jim Blalock + Chase Robertson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chase Robertson
25W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Richard Calverley
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.26
Nevin Langdon
48W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
Lucas Linares
25W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
John O'Brien
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Les Steiner
22W–2L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Rees Oliver
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Russell Gache
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Andy Beckman
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
Lance Hunter
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Ricky Shoup
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
Mark Ferguson
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.97
Jim Blalock
30W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.85
Thom Houston
26W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81
Steven Burdette
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.