Teams

Christianson - ACAC Raqueteers

2025 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-21vs Farmington- CravenLost 01
L#2 SinglesAnn Hague vs Lauren Holzman3-6, 2-6
2025-10-06vs BHSC- BoutonLost 01
L#2 SinglesAnn Hague vs Amy Bouton3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-30vs Farmington- CravenLost 03
L#1 SinglesWendi Cook vs Courtney Sievers3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLisa Christianson vs Kristina Loftus6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesApitchaya Miller vs Lauren Holzman4-6, 1-6
2025-09-19vs Farmington- CravenLost 01
L#2 SinglesAnn Hague vs Kristina Loftus3-6, 3-6
2025-09-10Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAnn Hague vs Elizabeth Brown5-7, 5-7
2025-09-05vs Farmington- CravenWon 21
W#1 SinglesDanielle Coccomo vs Rachael Craven4-2
W#2 SinglesWendi Cook vs Kristina Loftus5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesApitchaya Miller vs Jeanette Wang2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
Danielle Coccomo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Apitchaya Miller
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Lisa Christianson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.12
Ann Hague
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Wendi Cook
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendi Cook + Lisa Christianson134 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Coccomo + Apitchaya Miller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Danielle Coccomo
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Apitchaya Miller
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Lisa Christianson
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Ann Hague
27W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Wendi Cook
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.