Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Tan/EPTC#4

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Beth Hoy
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published 4
3.58
Brianna Barreiro
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Elena Sandoval
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Ernestina Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gloria Gomez
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
JENNIFER SIDA
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeanette Tan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Jennifer Woo
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published
Kristin Romney
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Lilia Moran
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lori Armendariz
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published
Lori DeLisser
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Melissa Dore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Monica Montalvo
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Selena Solis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Stephanie Kwan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gloria Gomez + Lilia Moran9162% games+9.5% vs expected
Stephanie Kwan + Jennifer Woo101049% games−8.5% vs expected
Lori Armendariz + Beth Hoy6177% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Dore + Lori DeLisser2446% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Lori DeLisser5070% gamesnot enough data
Selena Solis + Lori DeLisser1442% gamesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Jeanette Tan314 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Gomez + Melissa Dore314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Hoy
42W–12L career · 16 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Brianna Barreiro
43W–6L career · 25 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
Elena Sandoval
18W–15L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ernestina Herrera
12W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gloria Gomez
60W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
JENNIFER SIDA
26W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeanette Tan
36W–51L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Woo
81W–101L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristin Romney
42W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lilia Moran
30W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Armendariz
55W–56L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori DeLisser
94W–74L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Dore
107W–93L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Montalvo
16W–4L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Selena Solis
96W–102L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Kwan
29W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.