Teams

Reedy, Mark

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-11-12vs Kirsch, ScottWon 20
W#1 DoublesBlake Baraban / William Zung vs Sam Cargnel / Shane Loya3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBob Warkentine / Russell Packard vs Norman Friedman / Daniel Curley6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-09vs Kirsch, ScottWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Zung / Robert Jacobs vs Sam Cargnel / Norman Friedman4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRussell Packard / Bob Warkentine vs Henry Arst / James Dawkins7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Reedy / Jeff Kirkpatrick vs Michael Shinn / Michael Graves6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Eric Jay
published
3.79
William Zung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Adam Ritchie
published 4
Blake Baraban
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Russell Packard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Bob Warkentine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Kurt Davids
published
Jeff Kirkpatrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Reedy
published
Robert Jacobs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurt Davids + William Zung5066% games+10.0% vs expected
Kurt Davids + Adam Ritchie5161% games+9.7% vs expected
Eric Jay + William Zung16660% games+7.3% vs expected
Russell Packard + Bob Warkentine4256% games+3.2% vs expected
Russell Packard + William Zung8258% games+3.1% vs expected
Eric Jay + Blake Baraban7357% games+2.5% vs expected
Russell Packard + Mark Reedy3548% games+0.7% vs expected
Blake Baraban + William Zung4253% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Jay
54W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.85
William Zung
72W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Adam Ritchie
17W–28L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Blake Baraban
20W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Russell Packard
44W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Bob Warkentine
62W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Kurt Davids
64W–34L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jeff Kirkpatrick
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mark Reedy
13W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Jacobs
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.