Teams

SRose

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-02vs IPCochranWon 10
W#2 DoublesMalinda Schantz / Andrea Pfeiffer vs Paula Cochran / Linda Eskridge6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-27vs BKellyLost 01
L#3 DoublesGrace McPherson / Millie Rushton vs Wendy Christensen / Vicki Swank6-7, 2-6
2022-04-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesMalinda Schantz / Andrea Pfeiffer vs Rachel Whidby / Patricia Burgess6-1, 6-2
2022-04-04vs MWittkeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeslie O'Brien / Andrea Pfeiffer vs Chris Buscher / Annmarie Curle2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGrace McPherson / Millie Rushton vs Mary Tulenko / Cheryl Sweitzer6-0, 6-4
2022-03-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Cody / Andrea Pfeiffer vs Carole Spencer / Elaine Capriglione6-3, 6-1
2022-03-21vs EOsbourneWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Lynda Blelloch vs Ellen Osbourne / Debbie Hildebran6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-14vs TLeFevre 55+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIndia Pleasants / Millie Rushton vs Tara LeFevre / Deb Lanier2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Noelle Jackson
published
3.28
Stacey Jacobs
published
3.27
Leslie O'Brien
published
3.20
Lynda Blelloch
published
3.18
Paula Hale
published
3.06
Karen Cody
published
3.02
Millie Rushton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Andrea Pfeiffer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.89
Malinda Schantz
published
2.73
Wanda Wilson
published
2.61
India Pleasants
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Millie Rushton + Andrea Pfeiffer3644% games−2.1% vs expected
India Pleasants + Wanda Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Jackson
16W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Stacey Jacobs
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Leslie O'Brien
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Lynda Blelloch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
Paula Hale
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Karen Cody
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Millie Rushton
25W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Andrea Pfeiffer
73W–146L career · 10 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.93
Malinda Schantz
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
Wanda Wilson
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
India Pleasants
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.