Teams

EOsbourne

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-09vs CCOUCH/ALLENLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Johnstone / Marina Barthalmus vs Heidi Duggins / Sherry Goodson5-7, 6-7
2022-05-02vs BKellyWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Susana Harvey vs Sonja Kinzlmaier / Holly Eisenhour6-2, 6-3
2022-04-28vs MWittkeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusana Harvey / Suzanne Brown vs Annmarie Curle / Chris Buscher2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Cannity / Beverly Rubin vs Ginger Sidoti / Cheryl Sweitzer6-0, 6-3
2022-04-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Mitzi Ellis vs Jackie Evans / Kathleen Buckner7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-04-11vs BJMarchiLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rubin / Susana Harvey vs Noelle Schofield / Adela Whitten2-6, 4-6
2022-03-28vs TLeFevre 55+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCatherine Poulter / Marina Barthalmus vs Deb Lanier / Toni Paladino2-6, 4-6
2022-03-21vs SRoseLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Jocelyn Badulis vs Karen Cody / Wanda Wilson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-14vs IPCochranSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Hatlen / Suzanne Brown vs Kathy Bostrom / Kellie Snider2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Hildebran / Beverly Rubin vs Sharon Fred / Carol Vervaert6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Susana Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.69
Lori Hatlen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Marina Barthalmus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Linda Heidgerd
published
3.19
Jocelyn Badulis
published
2.90
Lynn Woodard
published
2.88
Ellen Osbourne
published 3
2.86
Mitzi Ellis
published
2.81
Dawn Johnstone
published 3
2.72
Beverly Rubin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Hatlen + Marina Barthalmus123 matchesnot enough data
Lori Hatlen + Susana Harvey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susana Harvey
402W–157L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%2%98%
3.77
4
Lori Hatlen
137W–170L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Marina Barthalmus
218W–213L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Linda Heidgerd
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Jocelyn Badulis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Lynn Woodard
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Ellen Osbourne
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
Mitzi Ellis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Dawn Johnstone
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Beverly Rubin
85W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.