Teams

BJMarchi

2022 Cap Spring USTA 55 & over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-09vs BKellyLost 01
L#2 DoublesMari Jameel / Adela Whitten vs Susan Kruchten / Kati Ray4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-11vs EOsbourneWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Hall / Mari Jameel vs Mitzi Ellis / Dawn Johnstone7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-28vs SRoseLost 01
L#2 DoublesAdela Whitten / Mari Jameel vs Lynda Blelloch / Leslie O'Brien4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-14vs CCOUCH/ALLENWon 10
W#3 DoublesMari Jameel / Betsy Fulcher vs Cathy Couch / Annette Tavernaro6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jane Hunter
published
3.17
Beverly Marchi
published 3.5
3.11
Noelle Schofield
published
3.00
Lori Hall
published
2.84
Betsy Fulcher
published 3
2.79
Mari Jameel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Hunter
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Beverly Marchi
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Noelle Schofield
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
Lori Hall
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Betsy Fulcher
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Mari Jameel
38W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.